Macleod U, Ross S, Fallowfield L, Watt G C M
General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 31;91(5):879-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602072.
A postal questionnaire was sent to affluent and deprived women with breast cancer in order to compare psychosocial aspects of care with the purpose of understanding the balance of care and explaining why deprived women have poorer outcomes. Data were collected regarding reported sources of information, SF-36 scores and ongoing causes of anxiety. The results demonstrate that affluent women were more likely to have received information from their hospital specialist (94.8 vs 76.0%) and from a breast care nurse (70.1 vs 40.0%) than deprived women. They were also more likely to have received information from magazines (50.6 vs 33.0%), newspapers (45.5 vs 22.0%) and television news (45.5 vs 26.0%). Deprived women had poorer SF-36 scores than affluent women, and reported greater anxiety about money (12.2 vs 2.8%), other health problems (22.1 vs 8.2%) and family problems (17.5 vs 6.9%). Personal and professional support is clearly important for patients with breast cancer. Health professionals need to be aware of the greater psychological distress demonstrated by deprived women, even some years after diagnosis with breast cancer, and seek to address it.
为了比较乳腺癌患者护理的社会心理方面,以便了解护理的平衡情况并解释贫困女性为何预后较差,我们向富裕和贫困的乳腺癌女性发送了一份邮政调查问卷。收集了有关报告的信息来源、SF-36评分和持续焦虑原因的数据。结果表明,与贫困女性相比,富裕女性更有可能从医院专科医生(94.8%对76.0%)和乳腺护理护士(70.1%对40.0%)那里获得信息。她们也更有可能从杂志(50.6%对33.0%)、报纸(45.5%对22.0%)和电视新闻(45.5%对26.0%)中获取信息。贫困女性的SF-36评分低于富裕女性,并且她们报告称对金钱(12.2%对2.8%)、其他健康问题(22.1%对8.2%)和家庭问题(17.5%对6.9%)更为焦虑。个人和专业支持对乳腺癌患者显然很重要。医疗专业人员需要意识到贫困女性表现出的更大心理困扰,即使在被诊断患有乳腺癌数年之后,也要设法解决这一问题。