Nishtar Sania
Heartfile, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2004 Jul 28;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-2-5.
The need for public-private partnerships arose against the backdrop of inadequacies on the part of the public sector to provide public good on their own, in an efficient and effective manner, owing to lack of resources and management issues. These considerations led to the evolution of a range of interface arrangements that brought together organizations with the mandate to offer public good on one hand, and those that could facilitate this goal though the provision of resources, technical expertise or outreach, on the other. The former category includes of governments and intergovernmental agencies and the latter, the non-profit and for-profit private sector. Though such partnerships create a powerful mechanism for addressing difficult problems by leveraging on the strengths of different partners, they also package complex ethical and process-related challenges. The complex transnational nature of some of these partnership arrangements necessitates that they be guided by a set of global principles and norms. Participation of international agencies warrants that they be set within a comprehensive policy and operational framework within the organizational mandate and involvement of countries requires legislative authorization, within the framework of which, procedural and process related guidelines need to be developed. This paper outlines key ethical and procedural issues inherent to different types of public-private arrangements and issues a Global Call to Action.
公私伙伴关系的需求是在公共部门由于缺乏资源和管理问题而无法独自高效且有效地提供公共产品的背景下产生的。这些考量促使了一系列界面安排的演变,一方面将负有提供公共产品使命的组织聚集在一起,另一方面则是那些能够通过提供资源、技术专长或推广来推动这一目标实现的组织。前一类包括政府和政府间机构,后一类包括非营利性和营利性私营部门。尽管此类伙伴关系通过利用不同伙伴的优势创建了一个解决难题的有力机制,但它们也带来了复杂的伦理和与流程相关的挑战。其中一些伙伴关系安排的复杂跨国性质使得它们需要遵循一套全球原则和规范。国际机构的参与保证了这些原则和规范应在组织任务范围内的全面政策和运营框架内制定,而各国的参与则需要立法授权,在此框架内,需要制定与程序和流程相关的指导方针。本文概述了不同类型公私安排中固有的关键伦理和程序问题,并发出了全球行动呼吁。