Suppr超能文献

个体识别、优势等级以及胜者和败者效应。

Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects.

作者信息

Dugatkin Lee Alan, Earley Ryan L

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40208, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1537-40. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2777.

Abstract

Winner and loser effects are defined as an increased probability of winning an aggressive interaction at time T, based on victories at time T-1, T-2, etc., and an increased probability of losing at time T, based on losses at time T-1, T-2, etc., respectively. Prior theoretical work on dominance hierarchy formation has demonstrated that when players are not capable of individual recognition, loser effects always produce a clear top-ranked (alpha) individual, but all other ranks in a group remain unclear; whereas winner effects always produce strict linear hierarchies in which the rank of each individual is clear. Paradoxically, however, when individual recognition--a phenomenon long thought to stabilize hierarchies--is possible, winner and loser effects have no impact on the probability of forming strict linear hierarchies.

摘要

胜者效应和败者效应分别定义为

在时间T赢得攻击性互动的概率增加,这是基于在时间T - 1、T - 2等的胜利;以及在时间T输掉的概率增加,这是基于在时间T - 1、T - 2等的失败。先前关于优势等级形成的理论研究表明,当参与者无法进行个体识别时,败者效应总是会产生一个明确的顶级(阿尔法)个体,但群体中的所有其他等级仍不明确;而胜者效应总是会产生严格的线性等级制度,并明确每个个体的等级。然而,矛盾的是,当个体识别(一种长期以来被认为能稳定等级制度的现象)成为可能时,胜者效应和败者效应不会对形成严格线性等级制度的概率产生影响。

相似文献

1
Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1537-40. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2777.
2
Self-organizing dominance hierarchies in a wild primate population.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1512.
3
Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects.
Bull Math Biol. 2015 Jun;77(6):927-52. doi: 10.1007/s11538-015-0070-z. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
4
Winner and loser effects in lobster cockroach contests for social dominance.
Horm Behav. 2019 Jan;107:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
A Game-Theoretical Winner and Loser Model of Dominance Hierarchy Formation.
Bull Math Biol. 2016 Jun;78(6):1259-90. doi: 10.1007/s11538-016-0186-9. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
A Simple Behavioral Model Predicts the Emergence of Complex Animal Hierarchies.
Am Nat. 2016 Jun;187(6):765-75. doi: 10.1086/686259. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Hierarchical development of dominance through the winner-loser effect and socio-spatial structure.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0243877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243877. eCollection 2022.
8
The social implications of winner and loser effects.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S488-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0235.
9
On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: a game-theoretic model.
Bull Math Biol. 1999 Nov;61(6):1151-86. doi: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0137.
10
The Evolution of Social Dominance through Reinforcement Learning.
Am Nat. 2021 May;197(5):560-575. doi: 10.1086/713758. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-specific competitive social feedback amplifies the role of early life contingency in male mice.
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 21:2024.04.19.590322. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590322.
2
Impact of dominance rank specification in dyadic interaction models.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0277130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277130. eCollection 2023.
4
Evolution of stress responses refine mechanisms of social rank.
Neurobiol Stress. 2021 Apr 21;14:100328. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100328. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Coevolution of cognitive abilities and identity signals in individual recognition systems.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 6;375(1802):20190467. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0467. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Stereotypy and variability of social calls among clustering female big-footed myotis (Myotis macrodactylus).
Zool Res. 2018 Mar 18;39(2):114-122. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.026.
7
Neurobiological mechanisms supporting experience-dependent resistance to social stress.
Neuroscience. 2015 Apr 16;291:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.072. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice.
Biol Lett. 2011 Jun 23;7(3):349-51. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0982. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
9
Stress amplifies memory for social hierarchy.
Front Neurosci. 2007 Oct 15;1(1):175-84. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.013.2007. eCollection 2007 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: a game-theoretic model.
Bull Math Biol. 1999 Nov;61(6):1151-86. doi: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0137.
3
Interaction effects of corticosterone and experience on aggressive behavior in the green anole lizard.
Horm Behav. 2003 Sep;44(3):281-92. doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00139-9.
4
Temporal patterns of limbic monoamine and plasma corticosterone response during social stress.
Neuroscience. 2003;116(2):553-63. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00708-x.
5
Watching fights raises fish hormone levels.
Nature. 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):475. doi: 10.1038/35054128.
6
Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure.
Anim Behav. 2000 May;59(5):1035-1048. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1400.
7
Neuronal adaptations to changes in the social dominance status of crayfish.
J Neurosci. 1997 Jan 15;17(2):697-708. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-02-00697.1997.
8
Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour.
J Theor Biol. 1974 Sep;47(1):223-43. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8.
9
Consequences of social conflict on plasma testosterone levels in rhesus monkeys.
Psychosom Med. 1975 Jan-Feb;37(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197501000-00006.
10
Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition".
J Theor Biol. 1979 Nov 7;81(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90081-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验