Gold Jeffrey J, Squire Larry R
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California 92161, USA.
Hippocampus. 2005;15(1):79-85. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20032.
Studies of memory-impaired patients will be most useful when quantitative neuroanatomical information is available about the patients being studied. Toward that end, in the case of medial temporal lobe amnesia, protocols have been developed from histological material that identify the boundaries of relevant structures on magnetic resonance images. Because the size of these structures varies considerably in the normal population, some correction for overall brain size is usually employed when calculating volume measurements. Although different correction procedures have been used to normalize for brain size, there has been little study of how well different methods reduce variability and which methods might be most useful. We measured the volume of the hippocampal region (hippocampus proper, dentate gyrus, and subicular complex) and the volumes of the temporopolar, entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in five memory-impaired patients and 30 controls. We then compared three different methods for normalizing the volume measurements: normalization by intracranial volume, normalization by aligning the brain to a standard atlas, and normalization by brain area at the level of the anterior commissure. Normalization by intracranial volume reduced variability in the volume measurements of nearly all brain regions to a greater extent than did normalization by other methods. When normalized by intracranial volume, the patients exhibited a mean reduction in hippocampal volume of about 40% and negligible reductions in the volumes of other medial temporal lobe structures. On the basis of earlier histological analysis of two other patients (L.M. and W.H.), who also had reductions in hippocampal size of about 40%, we suggest that a volume reduction in this range likely indicates a nearly complete loss of hippocampal neurons.
当能够获得所研究患者的定量神经解剖学信息时,对记忆受损患者的研究将最有帮助。为此,对于内侧颞叶失忆症患者,已经根据组织学材料制定了方案,以确定磁共振图像上相关结构的边界。由于这些结构的大小在正常人群中差异很大,因此在计算体积测量值时通常会对全脑大小进行一些校正。尽管已经使用了不同的校正程序来对脑大小进行标准化,但对于不同方法在减少变异性方面的效果以及哪种方法可能最有用,几乎没有研究。我们测量了5名记忆受损患者和30名对照者的海马区(海马本体、齿状回和下托复合体)体积以及颞极、内嗅、嗅周和海马旁皮质的体积。然后,我们比较了三种不同的体积测量标准化方法:通过颅内体积进行标准化、通过将大脑与标准图谱对齐进行标准化以及通过前连合水平的脑面积进行标准化。与其他方法相比,通过颅内体积进行标准化在更大程度上降低了几乎所有脑区体积测量值的变异性。当通过颅内体积进行标准化时,患者的海马体积平均减少约40%,而其他内侧颞叶结构的体积减少可忽略不计。根据对另外两名患者(L.M.和W.H.)的早期组织学分析,他们的海马大小也减少了约40%,我们认为这个范围内的体积减少可能表明海马神经元几乎完全丧失。