Suppr超能文献

气管造口术必须个体化!

Tracheostomy must be individualized!

作者信息

Pelosi Paolo, Severgnini Paolo

机构信息

Universita' degli Studi dell'Insubria, Servizio di Anestesia B, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):322-4. doi: 10.1186/cc2966. Epub 2004 Sep 8.

Abstract

Tracheostomy is one of the most frequent procedures carried out in critically ill patients with major advantages compared to translaryngeal endotracheal intubation such as reduced laryngeal anatomical alterations, reduced inspiratory load, better patient's tolerance and nursing. Thus, tracheostomy can enhance patient's care in patients who need prolonged mechanical ventilation and/or control of airways. The right timing of tracheostomy remains controversial, however it appears that early tracheostomy in selected severe trauma, burn and neurological patients could be effective to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation intensive care stay and costs. Percutaneous tracheostomy techniques are becoming the procedure of choice in the majority of the cases, since they are safe, easy and quick, and complications are minor. However, percutaneous tracheostomies should be always performed by experienced physicians to avoid unnecessary additional complications. It is not clear the superiority of one percutaneous technique compared to another, but experience of the operator and clinical individual anatomical, physiopathological characteristics of the patient should be always considered. We believe that the operator should have experience of at least one intrusive and one extrusive percutaneous technique. The general "optimal" tracheostomy technique and timing do not exist, but tracheostomy should be targeted on the patient's individual clinical characteristics.

摘要

气管切开术是危重症患者最常实施的手术之一,与经喉气管插管相比具有诸多显著优势,如减少喉部解剖结构改变、降低吸气负荷、提高患者耐受性及便于护理等。因此,气管切开术可改善需要长期机械通气和/或气道控制患者的护理。然而,气管切开术的最佳时机仍存在争议,不过在部分严重创伤、烧伤及神经科患者中,早期气管切开术似乎可有效缩短机械通气时间、减少重症监护病房住院时长及降低费用。在大多数情况下,经皮气管切开术正成为首选术式,因为其安全、简便、快捷,且并发症较少。然而,经皮气管切开术应始终由经验丰富的医生实施,以避免不必要的额外并发症。目前尚不清楚一种经皮技术相较于另一种技术的优越性,但始终应考虑术者的经验以及患者个体的解剖学、生理病理学特征。我们认为,术者应至少具备一种侵入性和一种非侵入性经皮技术的经验。不存在通用的“最佳”气管切开术技术和时机,气管切开术应根据患者个体临床特征进行。

相似文献

1
Tracheostomy must be individualized!气管造口术必须个体化!
Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):322-4. doi: 10.1186/cc2966. Epub 2004 Sep 8.
7
[Tracheostomy techniques].[气管切开术技术]
Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):73-83; quiz 84-5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0116-7.
8
[Tracheostomy in intensive care].[重症监护中的气管切开术]
Anaesthesist. 1999 Mar;48(3):142-56. doi: 10.1007/s001010050681.

引用本文的文献

2
Comparison of Elective Minimally Invasive with Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Adults.成人择期微创与传统外科气管切开术的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):11-15. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0983-3. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Percutaneous tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Jan;20(Supplement):S19-S25. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.197793.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验