Wagner Julie
University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2004 Sep;13(7):1279-85. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000037486.45671.61.
The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability of the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weight (SEIQoL-DW) in youth with diabetes. This measure asks respondents to assess the importance and satisfaction of domains that they nominate as being important to their own quality of life. Seventy-seven young people (age 8-17 years, M = 12.4) with type 1 diabetes were given the SEIQoL-DW. Data from 10 participants were deemed invalid due to respondents' inability to understand the task. Respondents whose data were deemed invalid were all under 12 years of age, M = 9.3. For participants with valid data, interviewers' ratings of participant boredom and fatigue were low. Time to complete the interview was reasonably short, M = 14.9 min. Of the 335 total QOL domains nominated by participants with valid data, only 19 domains (6%) were nominated with the assistance of a standard list. Forty-five participants nominated 'diabetes' as a life domain. Results indicate the SEIQoL-DW performed well with respondents over 12 years of age, is appropriate for samples with diabetes, and taps into diabetes-relevant domains. Further research with more diverse samples is needed before firm age cut-offs can be established for its use.
本研究的目的是评估糖尿病青少年对个人生活质量直接权重评估量表(SEIQoL-DW)的接受程度。该量表要求受访者评估他们认为对自身生活质量重要的领域的重要性和满意度。77名1型糖尿病青少年(年龄8 - 17岁,平均年龄M = 12.4岁)接受了SEIQoL-DW评估。由于受访者无法理解任务,10名参与者的数据被视为无效。数据被视为无效的受访者均未满12岁,平均年龄M = 9.3岁。对于数据有效的参与者,访谈者对参与者无聊和疲劳程度的评分较低。完成访谈的时间较短,平均时间M = 14.9分钟。在数据有效的参与者提名的335个生活质量领域中,只有19个领域(6%)是在标准列表的帮助下提名的。45名参与者将“糖尿病”列为生活领域。结果表明,SEIQoL-DW在12岁以上的受访者中表现良好,适用于糖尿病样本,并能涉及与糖尿病相关的领域。在确定其使用的明确年龄界限之前,需要对更多样化的样本进行进一步研究。