Levinson E M, Folino L
Department of Educational Psychology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 15705-1087.
Psychol Rep. 1994 Apr;74(2):419-24. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.419.
29 students (M age of 8.0 yr.) who were referred for evaluation were administered the Gifted Evaluation Scale, the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, and the WISC-III. Paired t tests comparing the mean GES Quotient with the K-BIT mean IQ and WISC-III Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQs yielded no statistically significant differences (range of IQs = 120.6 to 122.9). While the significant correlation of the GES Quotient and WISC-III Performance IQ was .42, r = -.37 for the GES Quotient and WISC-III Verbal IQ. No significant correlation was found between the GES Quotient and the WISC-III Full Scale or K-BIT IQs. The limitations and implications of the study, with regard to the use of the Gifted Evaluation Scale, are discussed.
29名被转介进行评估的学生(平均年龄8.0岁)接受了天才评估量表、考夫曼简易智力测验和韦氏儿童智力量表第三版的测试。配对t检验比较了天才评估量表商数的平均值与考夫曼简易智力测验的平均智商以及韦氏儿童智力量表第三版的言语、操作和全量表智商,结果未发现统计学上的显著差异(智商范围为120.6至122.9)。虽然天才评估量表商数与韦氏儿童智力量表第三版操作智商的显著相关性为0.42,但天才评估量表商数与韦氏儿童智力量表第三版言语智商的相关系数r为-0.37。未发现天才评估量表商数与韦氏儿童智力量表第三版全量表智商或考夫曼简易智力测验智商之间存在显著相关性。本文讨论了该研究在天才评估量表使用方面的局限性和意义。