Suppr超能文献

黄斑色素的测量:拉曼光谱法与异色闪烁光度法

Measurement of macular pigment: Raman spectroscopy versus heterochromatic flicker photometry.

作者信息

Neelam Kumari, O'Gorman Nicholas, Nolan John, O'Donovan Orla, Wong Hwee Bee, Au Eong Kah Guan, Beatty Stephen

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Republic of Ireland.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Mar;46(3):1023-32. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1032.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are several techniques for measuring macular pigment (MP) in vivo, of which Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a recently developed objective

METHOD

This study reports the reproducibility, test-retest variability, and validity of RS MP readings, by comparing them with heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP).

METHODS

MP was measured with HFP and RS in 120 healthy subjects, and the latter technique was also used on two separate occasions in a sample of 20 subjects to investigate the intersessional variability of readings. Intrasessional reproducibility of RS MP measurements was also calculated. In addition, serum concentrations of lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) were measured and correlated with both RS and HFP MP readings.

RESULTS

Mean (+/-SD) MP in the right eye was 0.279 +/- 0.145 and 0.319 +/- 0.155 with RS and HFP, respectively. The differences between corresponding MP readings taken on RS and HFP lay within the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for the two instruments in 93.6% and 94.4% of cases in the right and left eyes, respectively. Intrasessional reproducibility of RS readings, expressed as the coefficient of variation, was 8.42% +/- 7.12%. Ninety-five percent of MP readings taken with RS on two separate occasions lay within the 95% limits of agreement for the two sessions. A positive, but insignificant, relationship was observed between RS and HFP MP readings and serum concentrations of L and Z (RS, P = 0.356; HFP, P = 0.540).

CONCLUSIONS

RS, an objective method of measuring MP levels in vivo, exhibits acceptable reproducibility and test-retest variability. The results demonstrated good correlation between RS and HFP measurements of MP, thus authenticating RS against a validated psychophysical technique of measuring MP. However, investigators should use only one of these instruments for the duration of any given study because of differences in the scientific rationale, and the factors that influence RS and HFP measurements of MP.

摘要

目的

有多种体内测量黄斑色素(MP)的技术,其中拉曼光谱法(RS)是最近开发的一种客观方法。

方法

本研究通过将RS测量的MP读数与异色闪烁光度法(HFP)进行比较,报告了RS测量MP读数的可重复性、重测变异性和有效性。

方法

对120名健康受试者用HFP和RS测量MP,并且在20名受试者的样本中在两个不同时间使用后一种技术来研究读数的组间变异性。还计算了RS测量MP的组内重复性。此外,测量血清叶黄素(L)和玉米黄质(Z)的浓度,并将其与RS和HFP测量的MP读数相关联。

结果

右眼RS和HFP测量的平均(±标准差)MP分别为0.279±0.145和0.319±0.155。RS和HFP测量的相应MP读数之间的差异分别在右眼和左眼93.6%和94.4%的病例中处于两种仪器的Bland-Altman 95%一致性界限内。以变异系数表示的RS读数的组内重复性为8.42%±7.12%。在两个不同时间用RS测量的MP读数的95%落在两次测量的95%一致性界限内。观察到RS和HFP测量的MP读数与血清L和Z浓度之间存在正相关,但不显著(RS,P = 0.356;HFP,P = 0.540)。

结论

RS作为一种体内测量MP水平的客观方法,具有可接受的可重复性和重测变异性。结果表明RS和HFP测量MP之间具有良好的相关性,从而通过一种经过验证的测量MP的心理物理学技术验证了RS。然而,由于科学原理以及影响MP的RS和HFP测量的因素存在差异,研究人员在任何给定研究期间应仅使用这些仪器中的一种。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验