Kiebel Stefan J, Tallon-Baudry Catherine, Friston Karl J
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Nov;26(3):170-7. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20153.
We assess the suitability of conventional parametric statistics for analyzing oscillatory activity, as measured with electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG). The approach we consider is based on narrow-band power time-frequency decompositions of single-trial data. The ensuing power measures have a chi(2)-distribution. The use of the general linear model (GLM) under normal error assumptions is, therefore, difficult to motivate for these data. This is unfortunate because the GLM plays a central role in classical inference and is the standard estimation and inference framework for neuroimaging data. The key contribution of this work is to show that, in many circumstances, one can appeal to the central limit theorem and assume normality for generative models of power. If this is not appropriate, one can transform the data to render the error terms approximately normal. These considerations allow one to analyze induced and evoked oscillations using standard frameworks like statistical parametric mapping. We establish the validity of parametric tests using synthetic and real data and compare its performance to established nonparametric procedures.
我们评估传统参数统计方法对于分析通过脑电图/脑磁图(EEG/MEG)测量的振荡活动的适用性。我们所考虑的方法基于单试次数据的窄带功率时频分解。由此产生的功率测量值服从卡方分布。因此,在正态误差假设下使用一般线性模型(GLM)来处理这些数据很难找到依据。这很遗憾,因为GLM在经典推断中起着核心作用,并且是神经成像数据的标准估计和推断框架。这项工作的关键贡献在于表明,在许多情况下,可以诉诸中心极限定理,并假设功率生成模型呈正态分布。如果这不合适,可以对数据进行变换以使误差项近似正态。这些考虑因素使得人们能够使用统计参数映射等标准框架来分析诱发振荡和诱发反应。我们使用合成数据和真实数据确立了参数检验的有效性,并将其性能与已有的非参数方法进行比较。