• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

它在俄克拉荷马州可能行得通,但在奥克汉普顿会有效吗?家庭烟雾探测器有效性文献中的背景与实施情况。

It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors.

作者信息

Arai L, Roen K, Roberts H, Popay J

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007336.

DOI:10.1136/ip.2004.007336
PMID:15933405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1730217/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore data on factors affecting implementation processes in papers contributing to a Cochrane systematic review (SR) of smoke alarm interventions, supplemented by further papers not included in the review.

DESIGN

Screening for data on implementation on the basis of: (1) primary studies included in a Cochrane SR, (2) further papers relating to these and similar studies, and (3) approaches to authors of these and other relevant studies and reports.

RESULTS

Relatively few data were found to help people seeking to implement smoke alarm promotion interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

For practitioners and policymakers to be able to build on research evidence, researchers and journal editors need to ensure that sufficient data are published, or are otherwise available to interested parties to move from understanding the evidence to using it.

摘要

目的

在一篇Cochrane系统评价(SR)中,探讨有关影响烟雾报警器干预措施实施过程因素的数据,补充该评价未纳入的其他论文中的数据。

设计

基于以下方面筛选实施数据:(1)Cochrane SR中纳入的原始研究;(2)与这些及类似研究相关的其他论文;(3)这些及其他相关研究和报告的作者采用的方法。

结果

发现相对较少的数据可帮助寻求实施烟雾报警器推广干预措施的人员。

结论

为使从业者和政策制定者能够基于研究证据开展工作,研究人员和期刊编辑需要确保发表足够的数据,或以其他方式向相关方提供数据,以便从理解证据转向运用证据。

相似文献

1
It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors.它在俄克拉荷马州可能行得通,但在奥克汉普顿会有效吗?家庭烟雾探测器有效性文献中的背景与实施情况。
Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007336.
2
Preventive care in the emergency department: a systematic literature review on emergency department-based interventions that address smoke detectors in the home.急诊科的预防保健:关于基于急诊科的家庭烟雾探测器干预措施的系统文献综述。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;8(9):925-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01156.x.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
eHealth Interventions to Address Sexual Health, Substance Use, and Mental Health Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Process Evaluations.针对男男性行为者性健康、物质使用和心理健康的电子健康干预措施:过程评估的系统评价与综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 23;23(4):e22477. doi: 10.2196/22477.
2
To the bone: Comment on "I wanted a skeleton … they brought a prince": A qualitative investigation of factors mediating the implementation of a Performance Based Incentive program in Malawi.深入剖析:评《我想要一具骷髅……他们却带来一位王子》:对马拉维基于绩效的激励计划实施过程中中介因素的定性研究
SSM Popul Health. 2019 May 31;7:100305. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.005. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
A mixed-methods systematic review protocol to examine the use of physical restraint with critically ill adults and strategies for minimizing their use.一项混合方法的系统评价方案,旨在研究对危重症成年患者使用身体约束的情况以及尽量减少使用身体约束的策略。
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 21;5(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0372-8.
4
What is the effectiveness of the support worker role for people with dementia and their carers? A systematic review.对于痴呆症患者及其护理人员而言,支持工作者角色的有效性如何?一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 19;16:285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1531-2.
5
A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions.一种用于评估适应性公共卫生干预措施实施保真度的改进理论框架。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 8;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0457-8.
6
Development, inter-rater reliability and feasibility of a checklist to assess implementation (Ch-IMP) in systematic reviews: the case of provider-based prevention and treatment programs targeting children and youth.系统评价中用于评估实施情况的清单(Ch-IMP)的开发、评分者间信度及可行性:以针对儿童和青少年的基于提供者的预防与治疗项目为例
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Sep 7;15:73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0037-7.
7
What works in practice: user and provider perspectives on the acceptability, affordability, implementation, and impact of a family-based intervention for child overweight and obesity delivered at scale.实践中的成效:用户与提供者对大规模实施的针对儿童超重和肥胖的家庭干预措施的可接受性、可负担性、实施情况及影响的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 17;14:614. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-614.
8
Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews.庆祝方法学挑战与变革:反思定性证据在Cochrane系统评价中作用的出现及重要性。
Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 17;2:84. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-84.
9
Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER).针对复杂干预措施系统评价提供概念和情境“丰富度”的聚类搜索方法学:案例研究(CLUSTER)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 28;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-118.
10
The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses.牛津实施指数:将实施数据纳入系统评价和荟萃分析的新工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.006.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hawthorne studies-a fable for our times?霍桑研究——我们这个时代的一则寓言?
QJM. 2004 Jul;97(7):439-49. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hch070.
2
Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing.将公共卫生证据付诸实践:提高内城贫困地区住房中工作正常的烟雾报警器的普及率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):280-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.007948.
3
Effects of improved access to safety counseling, products, and home visits on parents' safety practices: results of a randomized trial.改善安全咨询、产品及家访服务对家长安全行为的影响:一项随机试验的结果
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jan;156(1):33-40. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.1.33.
4
Smoke alarm ownership and installation: a comparison of a rural and a suburban community in Georgia.烟雾报警器的拥有情况与安装情况:佐治亚州一个农村社区和一个郊区社区的对比
J Community Health. 2001 Oct;26(5):307-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1010478116532.
5
Smoke alarms, fire deaths, and randomised controlled trials.烟雾报警器、火灾死亡与随机对照试验
Inj Prev. 1999 Dec;5(4):244-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.4.244.
6
The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme.“让我们提高警惕!”倡议:一项烟雾报警器赠送计划。
Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177.
7
House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury.家庭火灾伤害预防最新情况。第一部分。致命和非致命家庭火灾伤害风险因素综述。
Inj Prev. 1999 Jun;5(2):145-50. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.2.145.
8
Implementation of injury prevention for children and young people.针对儿童和青少年的伤害预防措施的实施。
Inj Prev. 1998 Dec;4(4 Suppl):S26-33. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.2008.s26.
9
Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991.儿童伤害死亡率的下降是否因社会阶层而异?1981年和1991年特定阶层死亡率的比较。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 28;313(7060):784-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7060.784.
10
A randomized single-blind evaluation of a discharge teaching book for pediatric patients with burns.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):49-61.