• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将公共卫生证据付诸实践:提高内城贫困地区住房中工作正常的烟雾报警器的普及率。

Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing.

作者信息

Roberts H, Curtis K, Liabo K, Rowland D, DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I

机构信息

Child Health Research and Policy Unit, City University, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):280-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.007948.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2003.007948
PMID:15026437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1732727/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The UK government recommends that local authorities install battery operated smoke alarms to prevent fire related injury. However, a randomised controlled trial of smoke alarm installation in local authority housing found a low level of working alarms at follow up. Qualitative work, which accompanied the trial explored barriers and levers to the use of this public health intervention.

DESIGN

Semi-structured group and individual interviews were conducted with a sample of the adult participants in a randomised controlled trial of free smoke alarm installation. Group interviews and "draw and write" exercises were conducted with children at a local primary school.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of trial participants and primary school children in the trial neighbourhood.

SETTING

An inner city housing estate in central London.

MAIN RESULTS

The main barrier to smoke alarm use was the distress caused by false alarms. Although trial participants considered themselves to be at high risk for fires and would recommend smoke alarms to others, respondents' reports on the distress caused by false alarms suggest that people balance immediate and longer term risks to their health and wellbeing when they disable alarms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified some of the reasons for the low level of functioning smoke alarms, and problems experienced with alarms. The results have implications for the implementation of this public health intervention. The effectiveness of smoke alarm installation could be improved if alarm manufacturers and those responsible for implementation programmes considered ways of tackling the issues raised in this study.

摘要

研究目标

英国政府建议地方当局安装电池供电的烟雾报警器以预防与火灾相关的伤害。然而,一项针对地方当局住房中烟雾报警器安装的随机对照试验发现,随访时工作的报警器数量较少。伴随该试验开展的定性研究探讨了使用这种公共卫生干预措施的障碍和促进因素。

设计

对免费烟雾报警器安装随机对照试验中的成年参与者样本进行了半结构化小组访谈和个人访谈。在当地一所小学对儿童进行了小组访谈和“绘图与写作”练习。

参与者

试验参与者样本以及试验社区内的小学生。

地点

伦敦市中心的一个内城区住宅区。

主要结果

使用烟雾报警器的主要障碍是误报引起的困扰。尽管试验参与者认为自己火灾风险很高,并会向他人推荐烟雾报警器,但受访者关于误报造成困扰的报告表明,人们在禁用报警器时会权衡对自身健康和幸福的近期和长期风险。

结论

本研究确定了烟雾报警器工作水平低的一些原因以及报警器存在的问题。研究结果对实施这种公共卫生干预措施具有启示意义。如果报警器制造商和负责实施计划的人员考虑解决本研究中提出问题的方法,烟雾报警器安装的有效性可能会得到提高。

相似文献

1
Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing.将公共卫生证据付诸实践:提高内城贫困地区住房中工作正常的烟雾报警器的普及率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):280-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.007948.
2
Smoke alarm installation and function in inner London council housing.伦敦市中心区市政住房中的烟雾报警器安装与功能
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):400-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.400.
3
Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial.地方政府内城住房中工作烟雾报警器的普及率:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):998-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.998.
4
Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial.发放免费烟雾报警器后火灾及相关伤害的发生率:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.995.
5
Prevention of deaths and injuries caused by house fires: survey of local authority smoke alarm policies.
J Public Health Med. 2002 Sep;24(3):217-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/24.3.217.
6
The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme.“让我们提高警惕!”倡议:一项烟雾报警器赠送计划。
Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177.
7
Do nuisance alarms decrease functionality of smoke alarms near the kitchen? Findings from a randomised controlled trial.扰民警报是否会降低厨房附近烟雾报警器的功能?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Inj Prev. 2011 Jun;17(3):160-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.027805. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
8
Increasing smoke alarm operability through theory-based health education: a randomised trial.通过基于理论的健康教育提高烟雾报警器的可操作性:一项随机试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Dec;68(12):1168-74. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204182. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
How long do smoke alarms function? A cross-sectional follow-up survey of a smoke alarm installation programme.烟雾报警器能使用多久?一项烟雾报警器安装计划的横断面随访调查。
Inj Prev. 2014 Apr;20(2):103-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040824. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
10
When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms.当数量不足时:未得到烟雾报警器充分保护的家庭的患病率及特征
Inj Prev. 2005 Dec;11(6):364-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009175.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation fidelity of the 'Stay One Step Ahead' home safety intervention: a mixed-methods analysis.“一步领先”家庭安全干预措施的实施保真度:混合方法分析。
Inj Prev. 2023 Aug;29(4):340-346. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044855. Epub 2023 May 3.
2
Implications of a complexity perspective for systematic reviews and guideline development in health decision making.复杂性视角对卫生决策中系统评价和指南制定的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000899. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000899. eCollection 2019.
3
The Difficulty of Prevention: A Behavioral Perspective.预防的难点:行为视角
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Oct 7;10(1):14-16. doi: 10.1177/1559827615609532. eCollection 2016 Jan-Feb.
4
Implementing an Injury Prevention Briefing to aid delivery of key fire safety messages in UK children's centres: qualitative study nested within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.在英国儿童中心实施伤害预防简报以帮助传达关键消防安全信息:一项嵌套在多中心随机对照试验中的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 10;14:1256. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1256.
5
What works in practice: user and provider perspectives on the acceptability, affordability, implementation, and impact of a family-based intervention for child overweight and obesity delivered at scale.实践中的成效:用户与提供者对大规模实施的针对儿童超重和肥胖的家庭干预措施的可接受性、可负担性、实施情况及影响的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 17;14:614. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-614.
6
Fire and scald burn risks in urban communities: who is at risk and what do they believe about home safety?城市社区的火灾和烫伤风险:哪些人面临风险,以及他们对家庭安全的看法是什么?
Health Educ Res. 2013 Aug;28(4):599-611. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt046. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Pediatric fire deaths in Ontario: retrospective study of behavioural, social, and environmental risk factors.安大略省儿科火灾死亡:行为、社会和环境危险因素的回顾性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 May;57(5):e169-77.
8
Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries.改善家庭环境以减少伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD003600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003600.pub3.
9
Barriers to, and facilitators of, the prevention of unintentional injury in children in the home: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.家庭中预防儿童意外伤害的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和定性研究综合分析。
Inj Prev. 2011 Apr;17(2):119-26. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.026989. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
10
How has research in the past 5 years changed my practice?过去5年的研究如何改变了我的临床实践?
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Mar;92(3):246-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.086389.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses.证据、层次体系与类型学:各有所用。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jul;57(7):527-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.7.527.
2
Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial.地方政府内城住房中工作烟雾报警器的普及率:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):998-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.998.
3
Smoke detectors and house fires.烟雾探测器与房屋火灾
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):979-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.979.
4
Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.质量改进报告:通过将随机试验嵌入定性研究来改进其设计与实施:前列腺癌检测与治疗(ProtecT)研究。评论:向患者提供无偏信息可能具有挑战性。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):766-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766.
5
Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.评估公共卫生干预措施证据的标准。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.119.
6
Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting.临床环境中的个体层面伤害预防策略。
Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):53-82.
7
Smoke alarm installation and function in inner London council housing.伦敦市中心区市政住房中的烟雾报警器安装与功能
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):400-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.400.
8
Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to school: cross sectional survey of primary school children.小学生日常上学行程中乘车出行的影响因素:横断面调查
BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1426-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1426.
9
Qualitative research methods in interventions in injury.伤害干预中的定性研究方法
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jun;76(6):487-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.6.487.
10
Cause specific social class mortality differentials for child injury and poisoning in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士儿童伤害与中毒按病因划分的社会阶层死亡率差异
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):334-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.334.