Abelha Fernando J, Castro Maria A, Neves Aida M, Landeiro Nuno M, Santos Cristina C
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2005 Jun 6;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-5-7.
Inadvertent hypothermia is not uncommon in the immediate postoperative period and it is associated with impairment and abnormalities in various organs and systems that can lead to adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence, the predictive factors and outcome of core hypothermia on admission to a surgical ICU.
All consecutive 185 adult patients who underwent scheduled or emergency noncardiac surgery admitted to a surgical ICU between April and July 2004 were admitted to the study. Tympanic membrane core temperature (Tc) was measured before surgery, on arrival at ICU and every two hours until 6 hours after admission. The following variables were also recorded: age, sex, body weight and height, ASA physical status, type of surgery, magnitude of surgical procedure, anesthesia technique, amount of intravenous fluids administered during anesthesia, use of temperature monitoring and warming techniques, duration of the anesthesia, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay and SAPS II score. Patients were classified as either hypothermic (Tc < or = 35 degrees C) or normothermic (Tc> 35 degrees C). Univariate analysis and multiple regression binary logistic with an odds ratio (OR) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were used to compare the two groups of patients and assess the relationship between each clinical predictor and hypothermia. Outcome measured as ICU length of stay and mortality was also assessed.
Prevalence of hypothermia on ICU admission was 57.8%. In univariate analysis temperature monitoring, use of warming techniques and higher previous body temperature were significant protective factors against core hypothermia. In this analysis independent predictors of hypothermia on admission to ICU were: magnitude of surgery, use of general anesthesia or combined epidural and general anesthesia, total intravenous crystalloids administrated and total packed erythrocytes administrated, anesthesia longer than 3 hours and SAPS II scores. In multiple logistic regression analysis significant predictors of hypothermia on admission to the ICU were magnitude of surgery (OR 3.9, 95% CI, 1.4-10.6, p = 0.008 for major surgery; OR 3.6, 95% CI, 1.5-9.0, p = 0.005 for medium surgery), intravenous administration of crystalloids (in litres) (OR 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.7, p = 0.012) and SAPS score (OR 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.7, p = 0.014); higher previous temperature in ward was a significant protective factor (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7, p = 0.003). Hypothermia was neither a risk factor for hospital mortality nor a predictive factor for staying longer in ICU.
The prevalence of patient hypothermia on ICU arrival was high. Hypothermia at time of admission to the ICU was not an independent factor for mortality or for staying longer in ICU.
术后即刻意外低体温并不少见,它与各器官和系统的功能损害及异常相关,可导致不良后果。本研究旨在评估外科重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者入院时核心体温过低的发生率、预测因素及预后情况。
选取2004年4月至7月间收治入外科ICU的所有连续185例接受择期或急诊非心脏手术的成年患者作为研究对象。在手术前、抵达ICU时以及入院后6小时内每两小时测量一次鼓膜核心温度(Tc)。同时记录以下变量:年龄、性别、体重和身高、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级、手术类型、手术范围、麻醉技术、麻醉期间静脉输液量、体温监测及保暖技术的使用情况、麻醉持续时间、ICU住院时间、住院总时间及简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。患者分为体温过低组(Tc≤35℃)和体温正常组(Tc>35℃)。采用单因素分析及多因素回归二元逻辑回归分析,通过比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)比较两组患者,并评估各临床预测因素与体温过低之间的关系。还评估了以ICU住院时间和死亡率作为指标的预后情况。
ICU入院时体温过低的发生率为57.8%。单因素分析显示,体温监测、保暖技术的使用及术前较高体温是预防核心体温过低的显著保护因素。该分析中,ICU入院时体温过低的独立预测因素为:手术范围、全身麻醉或硬膜外联合全身麻醉的使用、静脉输注晶体液总量和浓缩红细胞总量、麻醉时间超过3小时及SAPS II评分。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,ICU入院时体温过低的显著预测因素为手术范围(大手术的OR为3.9,95%CI为1.4 - 10.6,p = 0.008;中等手术的OR为3.6,95%CI为1.5 - 9.0,p = 0.005)、晶体液静脉输注量(升)(OR为1.4,95%CI为1.1 - 1.7,p = 0.012)及SAPS评分(OR为1.0,95%CI为1.0 - 1.7,p = 0.014);病房内术前较高体温是显著保护因素(OR为0.3,95%CI为0.1 - 0.7,p = 0.003)。体温过低既不是医院死亡率的危险因素,也不是在ICU停留时间延长的预测因素。
患者抵达ICU时体温过低的发生率较高。ICU入院时体温过低并非死亡率或在ICU停留时间延长的独立因素。