• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康福利定价:一种成本最小化方法。

Pricing health benefits: a cost-minimization approach.

作者信息

Miller Nolan H

机构信息

John F. Kennedy School of Government, 79 J.F. Kennedy Street L103, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2005 Sep;24(5):931-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.03.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.03.001
PMID:16129129
Abstract

We study the role of health benefits in an employer's compensation strategy, given the overall goal of minimizing total compensation cost (wages plus health-insurance cost). When employees' health status is private information, the employer's basic benefit package consists of a base wage and a moderate health plan, with a generous plan available for an additional charge. We show that in setting the charge for the generous plan, a cost-minimizing employer should act as a monopolist who sells "health plan upgrades" to its workers, and we discuss ways tax policy can encourage efficiency under cost-minimization and alternative pricing rules.

摘要

鉴于将总薪酬成本(工资加上医疗保险成本)降至最低的总体目标,我们研究了健康福利在雇主薪酬策略中的作用。当员工的健康状况属于私人信息时,雇主的基本福利套餐包括基本工资和适度的健康计划,额外付费可获得更优厚的计划。我们表明,在设定优厚计划的费用时,追求成本最小化的雇主应扮演向其员工出售“健康计划升级”的垄断者角色,并且我们讨论了税收政策在成本最小化和替代定价规则下如何鼓励提高效率的方法。

相似文献

1
Pricing health benefits: a cost-minimization approach.健康福利定价:一种成本最小化方法。
J Health Econ. 2005 Sep;24(5):931-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.03.001.
2
The employer's case for health management.雇主开展健康管理的理由。
Benefits Q. 2006;22(1):23-33.
3
Health benefits in 2004: four years of double-digit premium increases take their toll on coverage.2004年的健康福利:连续四年两位数的保费增长对保险覆盖范围造成了影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):200-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.200. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
4
IBM's pursuit of quality and cost-effective health benefits.IBM对优质且具成本效益的健康福利的追求。
Manag Care Q. 1996 Winter;4(1):59-66.
5
Estimating workers' marginal valuation of employer health benefits: would insured workers prefer more health insurance or higher wages?估算员工对雇主健康福利的边际估值:参保员工会更倾向于更多的健康保险还是更高的工资?
J Health Econ. 2008 Jan;27(1):89-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.013. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
6
Direct provider contracting: one employer's experience.直接供应商签约:一家雇主的经验。
Benefits Q. 1999;15(1):37-41.
7
Employer contribution and premium growth in health insurance.雇主在健康保险方面的缴费及保费增长。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Total system costs and the case of the executive's hernia.
Benefits Q. 1998;14(1):45-54.
9
An employer's experience with infertility coverage: a case study.雇主在不孕保险方面的经验:案例研究。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):2103-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.081. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
Self-funding health insurance for small employers: is it the right way to go?小型雇主的自筹健康保险:这是正确的选择吗?
Empl Benefits J. 2000 Sep;25(3):3-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an Efficient and Effective Clinical Pathway for Cesarean Section in West Sumatra (Indonesia).印度尼西亚西苏门答腊剖宫产高效临床路径的开发。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 30;16:461-469. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S447249. eCollection 2024.
2
Paying Medicare Advantage plans: To level or tilt the playing field.支付医疗保险优势计划:为了拉平或倾斜竞争环境。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Will employers drop health insurance coverage because of the Affordable Care Act?
由于《平价医疗法案》,雇主会放弃医疗保险覆盖范围吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1522-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0526.
4
Making Medicare advantage a middle-class program.使联邦医疗保险优势计划成为中产阶级计划。
J Health Econ. 2013 Mar;32(2):463-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
Gold and silver health plans: accommodating demand heterogeneity in managed competition.金银健康计划:在管理竞争中满足需求异质性。
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1011-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 28.