Schneider Stephen H, Mastrandrea Michael D
Center for Environmental Science and Policy, Stanford University, Encina Hall East, E415, Stanford, CA 94305-6055, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15728-35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506356102. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
Climate policy decisions driving future greenhouse gas mitigation efforts will strongly influence the success of compliance with Article 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the prevention of "dangerous anthropogenic interference (DAI) with the climate system." However, success will be measured in very different ways by different stakeholders, suggesting a spectrum of possible definitions for DAI. The likelihood of avoiding a given threshold for DAI depends in part on uncertainty in the climate system, notably, the range of uncertainty in climate sensitivity. We combine a set of probabilistic global average temperature metrics for DAI with probability distributions of future climate change produced from a combination of several published climate sensitivity distributions and a range of proposed concentration stabilization profiles differing in both stabilization level and approach trajectory, including overshoot profiles. These analyses present a "likelihood framework" to differentiate future emissions pathways with regard to their potential for preventing DAI. Our analysis of overshoot profiles in comparison with non-overshoot profiles demonstrates that overshoot of a given stabilization target can significantly increase the likelihood of exceeding "dangerous" climate impact thresholds, even though equilibrium warming in our model is identical for non-overshoot concentration stabilization profiles having the same target.
推动未来温室气体减排努力的气候政策决策,将对《联合国气候变化框架公约》第二条规定的履约成功产生重大影响,即防止“对气候系统的危险的人为干扰(DAI)”。然而,不同利益相关方衡量成功的方式大相径庭,这意味着对DAI可能有一系列不同的定义。避免达到特定DAI阈值的可能性部分取决于气候系统的不确定性,尤其是气候敏感性的不确定性范围。我们将一组用于DAI的概率性全球平均温度指标,与由几种已发表的气候敏感性分布以及一系列在稳定水平和路径轨迹(包括超调路径)方面均有所不同的拟议浓度稳定情景组合生成的未来气候变化概率分布相结合。这些分析提出了一个“可能性框架”,以区分未来排放路径在防止DAI方面的潜力。我们将超调情景与非超调情景进行比较分析表明,即使在我们的模型中,具有相同目标的非超调浓度稳定情景的平衡变暖相同,但超过给定稳定目标的超调仍会显著增加超过“危险”气候影响阈值的可能性。