Rossbach Bernd, Buchta Mark, Csanády György A, Filser Johannes G, Hilla Wolfgang, Windorfer Klaus, Stork Joachim, Zschiesche Wolfgang, Gefeller Olaf, Pfahlberg Annette, Schaller Karl-Heinz, Egerer Ellen, Escobar Pinzón Luis Carlos, Letzel Stephan
Institute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University of Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Toxicol Lett. 2006 Apr 10;162(2-3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.09.018. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
To evaluate an adequate strategy for biological monitoring of aluminium (Al), a group of 62 Al welders (age in 1999: 23-51 years, median 35 years) was surveyed annually from 1999 to 2003 by determination of pre- and post-shift Al in urine and plasma. Biomonitoring was supplemented by personal air measurements of the total dust concentration. The welders' internal exposure was compared to the exposure of 60 non-exposed assembly workers (age in 1999: 21-51 years, median: 36 years) who were surveyed in 1999, 2001 and 2003. Having a nearly constant dust exposure, median concentrations of Al in urine (Al in plasma) of the welders decreased from 40.1 microg/g to 19.8 microg/g creatinine (8.7 to 4.6 microg/l). For the control group the median levels of Al in urine (plasma) ranged from 4.8 microg/g to 5.2 microg/g creatinine (2.4-4.3 microg/l) indicating a higher sensitivity for the marker Al in urine. No systematic differences have been found between pre- and post-shift internal exposure. This might be caused by the slow elimination kinetics and low systemic bioavailability of Al. A correlation analysis did not yield close relationships between dust exposure, Al in plasma and Al in urine underlining the importance of biomonitoring for assessment of Al exposure.
为评估一种合适的铝(Al)生物监测策略,1999年至2003年期间,每年对一组62名铝焊工(1999年年龄:23 - 51岁,中位数35岁)进行调查,通过测定班前和班后尿液及血浆中的铝含量。生物监测辅以个人空气中总粉尘浓度的测量。将焊工的内部暴露情况与60名未暴露的装配工人(1999年年龄:21 - 51岁,中位数:36岁)的暴露情况进行比较,这些装配工人于1999年、2001年和2003年接受了调查。由于粉尘暴露几乎恒定,焊工尿液中铝的中位数浓度(血浆中铝)从40.1微克/克肌酐降至19.8微克/克肌酐(8.7至4.6微克/升)。对照组尿液(血浆)中铝的中位数水平在4.8微克/克至5.2微克/克肌酐(2.4 - 4.3微克/升)之间,表明尿液中铝标志物的敏感性更高。班前和班后内部暴露之间未发现系统性差异。这可能是由于铝的消除动力学缓慢和全身生物利用度低所致。相关性分析未得出粉尘暴露、血浆中铝和尿液中铝之间的密切关系,这突出了生物监测在评估铝暴露方面的重要性。