Suppr超能文献

儿童对与研究相关的风险和益处的理解。

Children's understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research.

作者信息

Burke T M, Abramovitch R, Zlotkin S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):715-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.003228.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study was to maximise the amount of information children and adolescents understand about the risks and benefits associated with participation in a biomedical research study.

DESIGN

Participants were presented with one of six hypothetical research protocols describing how to fix a fractured thigh using either a "standard" cast or "new" pins procedure. Risks and benefits associated with each of the treatment options were manipulated so that for each one of the six protocols there was either a correct or ambiguous choice.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Two hundred and fifty one children, ages 6-15 (53% boys), and 237 adults (30% men) were interviewed while waiting for a clinic appointment at the Hospital for Sick Children.

RESULTS

Using standardised procedures and questionnaires, it was determined that most participants, regardless of age group, were able to understand the basic purpose and procedures involved in the research, and most were able to choose the "correct" operation. The younger children, however, showed an overall preference for a cast operation, whereas the older participants were more likely to choose the pins.

CONCLUSIONS

By creating age appropriate modules of information, children as young as six years can understand potentially difficult and complex concepts such as the risks and benefits associated with participation in biomedical research. It appears, however, that different criteria were used for treatment preference, regardless of associated risks; older participants tended to opt for mobility (the pins procedure) whereas younger participants stayed with the more familiar cast operation.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是最大限度地增加儿童和青少年对参与生物医学研究相关风险和益处的理解信息量。

设计

向参与者展示六个假设研究方案之一,描述如何使用“标准”石膏或“新型”钢针程序治疗大腿骨折。对每个治疗方案的风险和益处进行了调整,以便在六个方案中的每一个中都有一个正确或模糊的选择。

参与者和地点

在病童医院等待门诊预约时,对251名6至15岁的儿童(53%为男孩)和237名成年人(30%为男性)进行了访谈。

结果

使用标准化程序和问卷确定,大多数参与者,无论年龄组,都能够理解研究的基本目的和程序,并且大多数人能够选择“正确”的手术。然而,年幼的儿童总体上更喜欢石膏手术,而年长的参与者更有可能选择钢针。

结论

通过创建适合年龄的信息模块,年仅六岁的儿童就能理解诸如参与生物医学研究相关的风险和益处等潜在困难和复杂的概念。然而,似乎无论相关风险如何,治疗偏好都使用了不同的标准;年长的参与者倾向于选择行动能力(钢针程序),而年幼的参与者则选择更熟悉的石膏手术。

相似文献

7
Femoral shaft fractures in children.儿童股骨干骨折
Injury. 2005 Feb;36 Suppl 1:A86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.018.
8
Informed consent in children and adolescents: age, maturation and psychological state.
J Adolesc Health. 1995 Mar;16(3):185-90. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(94)00063-K.

引用本文的文献

3
Children's Understanding of Informed Assents in Research Studies.儿童对研究中知情同意的理解。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 10;9(7):871. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070871.

本文引用的文献

8
Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized?知情同意——为何其目标未能完全实现?
N Engl J Med. 1980 Apr 17;302(16):896-900. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021605.
10
Obtaining informed consent. Form or substance.
Arch Intern Med. 1969 Jun;123(6):682-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验