Martin Curran M, Smith D G
Villardi Consulting, Singapore.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2005 Nov;37 Suppl 1:67-86. doi: 10.1007/s11250-005-9009-y.
This paper is based on an impact assessment of a donkey provision programme in Ethiopia. The work was carried out in 2001 as part of a DFID Livestock Production Programme project 'Use and management of donkeys by poor societies in peri-urban areas in Ethiopia'. In order to establish whether donkey ownership was a cause or an effect of improved livelihoods, an investigation was carried out that compared non-donkey-owning households with households that had owned no donkey until they were given one by a local NGO. Indicators that poor people use to express their well-being, wealth and health status (components of their livelihoods) were identified and used to compare communities. Guidelines were prepared for project managers for carrying out livelihood indicator identification and impact assessment. The results showed that the informants used a range of indicators to assess their livelihoods. A selection of these were investigated in depth, including number of children per household attending school, number of people per household earning an income, type and quantity of staple foods bought, and ability to save. A trend was identified that demonstrated that donkey owners' livelihoods were improved compared to non-donkey owners.
本文基于对埃塞俄比亚一项毛驴供应计划的影响评估。该工作于2001年开展,是国际发展部畜牧生产计划项目“埃塞俄比亚城市周边贫困社区对毛驴的使用与管理”的一部分。为确定拥有毛驴是改善生计的原因还是结果,开展了一项调查,将非毛驴养殖户与那些直到当地一个非政府组织给了他们一头毛驴之前都没有毛驴的养殖户进行比较。确定了穷人用来表达其福祉、财富和健康状况(其生计的组成部分)的指标,并用于比较不同社区。为项目经理编写了开展生计指标识别和影响评估的指南。结果表明,被调查者使用一系列指标来评估他们的生计。对其中一些指标进行了深入调查,包括每户上学儿童数量、每户有收入的人数、购买的主食类型和数量以及储蓄能力。确定了一种趋势,表明与非毛驴养殖户相比,毛驴养殖户的生计得到了改善。