Velmahos George C, Constantinou Constantinos, Tillou Areti, Brown Carlos V, Salim Ali, Demetriades Demetrios
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1155-60; discussion 1160-1. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196435.18073.6d.
Computed tomographic (CT) scanning is increasingly used in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (AGSWs) selected for nonoperative management (NOM). Triple-contrast CT scanning (i.e., intravenous, oral, and rectal) has produced encouraging initial results. The exact role and usefulness of CT scanning with intravenous contrast only is unknown.
Hemodynamically stable AGSW patients without generalized abdominal tenderness were offered a trial of NOM, underwent single-contrast (intravenous) CT scanning, and were prospectively followed from July 1, 2002, to May 31, 2004. The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning to detect organ injuries requiring repair were calculated against the clinical results of NOM. The effect of CT scanning in management was recorded.
One hundred patients with nontangential AGSWs were included. Twenty-six required laparotomy, which was nontherapeutic in five (19%). These five patients underwent operation on the basis of misleading CT findings (n = 3) or development of clinical symptoms (n = 2). Two CT scans were false-negative, and these patients were operated on at 121 and 307 minutes after arrival for hollow visceral injuries and recovered without postoperative complications. Three CT scans were false-positive and resulted in nontherapeutic laparotomies without postoperative complications. The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning was 90.5% and 96%, respectively. CT findings resulted in a change of management in 40 patients. In nine, the decision to operate was changed to a decision to manage nonoperatively; whereas in eight, the opposite occurred. In addition, in 17, the decision to observe was changed to a decision to discharge; whereas in 1, the opposite occurred. Finally, five patients had additional tests after the findings of CT scanning.
Abdominal CT scanning is a safe and useful method of selecting AGSW patients for NOM. Further exploration is needed to define the precise benefits of routine CT scanning over clinical examination with selective CT scanning.
计算机断层扫描(CT)在选择非手术治疗(NOM)的腹部枪伤(AGSW)患者中应用越来越广泛。三联对比CT扫描(即静脉内、口服和直肠)已取得令人鼓舞的初步结果。仅使用静脉造影剂的CT扫描的确切作用和实用性尚不清楚。
对血流动力学稳定且无全腹压痛的AGSW患者进行NOM试验,接受单对比(静脉内)CT扫描,并于2002年7月1日至2004年5月31日进行前瞻性随访。根据NOM的临床结果计算CT扫描检测需要修复的器官损伤的敏感性和特异性。记录CT扫描在治疗中的作用。
纳入100例非切线型AGSW患者。26例需要剖腹手术,其中5例(19%)手术未起到治疗作用。这5例患者因CT检查结果误导(n = 3)或出现临床症状(n = 2)而接受手术。2例CT扫描为假阴性,这些患者因中空脏器损伤在到达后121分钟和307分钟接受手术,术后恢复且无并发症。3例CT扫描为假阳性,导致非治疗性剖腹手术且术后无并发症。CT扫描的敏感性和特异性分别为为90.5%和96%。CT检查结果导致40例患者的治疗方案改变。其中9例,手术决定改为非手术治疗;而8例则相反。此外,17例中,观察决定改为出院决定;而1例则相反。最后,5例患者在CT扫描结果出来后进行了额外检查。
腹部CT扫描是选择AGSW患者进行NOM的一种安全且有用的方法。需要进一步探索以明确常规CT扫描相对于选择性CT扫描的临床检查的确切优势。