• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

革兰氏染色与科佩洛夫染色在妊娠期细菌性阴道病诊断中的比较

Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.

作者信息

Libman Michael D, Kramer Michael, Platt Robert

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;54(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.017. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.017
PMID:16427240
Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is commonly diagnosed by using the Nugent score, a semiquantitative scoring system to evaluate bacterial morphotypes on Gram stain of vaginal secretions. Some authors have suggested using the Kopeloff modification of the Gram stain. Asymptomatic BV in pregnancy has been associated with adverse outcomes. We performed both stains on simultaneously collected vaginal smears from 2652 women at 24-26 weeks of gestation. Gram staining gave significantly higher (more abnormal) Nugent scores than Kopeloff staining. Compared to the Kopeloff stain, the number of specimens graded as indeterminate or consistent with BV by Gram stain increased by 29% (469 versus 364, P<.001). Interrater reliability of the Nugent score (n=413) for Kopeloff staining was significantly better than Gram staining (agreement=74% versus 63%, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.87 versus 0.79, P<.05, 95% confidence intervals 0.85-0.89 and 0.75-0.82, respectively).

摘要

细菌性阴道病(BV)通常采用 Nugent 评分进行诊断,这是一种半定量评分系统,用于评估阴道分泌物革兰氏染色后的细菌形态类型。一些作者建议使用革兰氏染色的 Kopeloff 改良法。妊娠期间的无症状 BV 与不良结局相关。我们对 2652 名妊娠 24 - 26 周的女性同时采集的阴道涂片进行了两种染色。革兰氏染色给出的 Nugent 评分显著更高(更异常),高于 Kopeloff 染色。与 Kopeloff 染色相比,革兰氏染色判定为不确定或符合 BV 的标本数量增加了 29%(469 例对 364 例,P <.001)。Kopeloff 染色的 Nugent 评分(n = 413)的评分者间可靠性显著优于革兰氏染色(一致性分别为 74%对 63%,组内相关系数分别为 0.87 对 0.79,P <.05,95%置信区间分别为 0.85 - 0.89 和 0.75 - 0.82)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.革兰氏染色与科佩洛夫染色在妊娠期细菌性阴道病诊断中的比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;54(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.017. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
2
Relation between Gram-stain and clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis with special reference to Gram grade II evaluation.革兰氏染色与诊断细菌性阴道病临床标准之间的关系,特别提及革兰氏分级II评估
Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Jan;14(1):6-10. doi: 10.1258/095646203321043183.
3
[Diagnostic value of Gram stain for assessment of vaginal smears during pregnancy].[革兰氏染色对孕期阴道涂片评估的诊断价值]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2004;56(1):93-8.
4
The short-term variability of bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by Nugent Gram stain criteria among sexually active women in Rakai, Uganda.乌干达拉凯地区性活跃女性中,依据 Nugent Gram 染色标准诊断的细菌性阴道病的短期变异性。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Feb;38(2):111-6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f0bdd0.
5
BVBLUE test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women attending antenatal care at Phramongkutklao Hospital.曼谷诗里拉吉医院产前检查孕妇细菌性阴道病诊断的BVBLUE检测
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88 Suppl 3:S7-13.
6
Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.革兰氏染色与巴氏涂片法在细菌性阴道病诊断中的比较。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2002;10(4):203-7. doi: 10.1155/S1064744902000236.
7
Variation in Nugent score and leukocyte count in fluid collected from different vaginal sites.从不同阴道部位采集的液体中 Nugent 评分和白细胞计数的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;105(1):120-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000147842.69832.7d.
8
Bacterial vaginosis among a group of married Jordanian women: occurrence and laboratory diagnosis.一组约旦已婚女性中的细菌性阴道病:发生率及实验室诊断
Cytobios. 2001;105(408):35-43.
9
A comparison of the use of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cytological smears with Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy.在妊娠早期,比较巴氏染色宫颈细胞学涂片与革兰氏染色阴道涂片用于诊断细菌性阴道病的情况。
Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Feb;10(2):93-7. doi: 10.1258/0956462991913709.
10
Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.在临床环境中对低收入孕妇进行细菌性阴道病监测时,革兰氏染色法在检测细菌性阴道病方面比临床标准显示出更高的敏感性。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6(5):204-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:5<204::AID-IDOG3>3.0.CO;2-R.

引用本文的文献

1
Detergent-stable amylase production by strain OPSA3 isolated from soil; optimization by response surface methodology.从土壤中分离的OPSA3菌株产耐洗涤剂淀粉酶;采用响应面法进行优化。
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2023 Jul 17;39:e00808. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00808. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Group B Serotypes in Pregnant Women From the Western Cape Region of South Africa.南非西开普地区孕妇中的B组血清型
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 4;6:356. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00356. eCollection 2018.
3
Evidence of a gene-environment interaction of NODAL variants and inflammation in preterm birth.
早产中NODAL基因变异与炎症的基因-环境相互作用的证据。
J Perinatol. 2018 May;38(5):482-488. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0073-3. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
4
Anaerobes and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: virulence factors contributing to vaginal colonisation.妊娠时的厌氧菌与细菌性阴道病:导致阴道定植的毒力因子。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jul 10;11(7):6979-7000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110706979.
5
Self-collected vaginal swabs for the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis and the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.自行采集阴道拭子进行定量实时聚合酶链反应检测阴道阿托波菌和阴道加德纳菌,并诊断细菌性阴道病。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;31(4):513-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1341-8. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.定量实时 PCR 检测与临床和革兰氏染色鉴定细菌性阴道病的诊断准确性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;29(12):1547-52. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1039-3. Epub 2010 Sep 3.