• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pre-discharge "car seat challenge" for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.出院前“汽车座椅挑战”对预防早产儿发病和死亡的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD005386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005386.pub2.
2
Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.预防早产和/或低出生体重儿出生时体温过低的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 12;2(2):CD004210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004210.pub5.
3
Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.早期使用促红细胞生成素预防早产和/或低出生体重儿的红细胞输血
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004863.pub2.
4
Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants.早产儿随意喂养或按需/半按需喂养与定时喂养的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005255.pub2.
5
Iodine supplementation for the prevention of mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.补充碘预防早产儿死亡及不良神经发育结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005253.pub2.
6
Antenatal corticosteroids prior to planned caesarean at term for improving neonatal outcomes.择期剖宫产术前应用产前皮质激素以改善新生儿结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 22;12(12):CD006614. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub4.
7
Glutamine supplementation to prevent morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.补充谷氨酰胺以预防早产儿的发病和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD001457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001457.pub2.
8
Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants.早期容量扩充预防极早产儿的发病和死亡
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD002055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002055.pub2.
9
Non-nutritive sucking for promoting physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants.非营养性吸吮促进早产儿生理稳定性和营养状况
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub2.
10
Glucocorticosteroids for infants with biliary atresia following Kasai portoenterostomy.肝门空肠吻合术后胆道闭锁婴儿的糖皮质激素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD008735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008735.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
The Association Between Routine Car Seat Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization.常规汽车安全座椅筛查与后续医疗保健利用之间的关联。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):913-922. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006509.
3
Is it time to study routine car seat tolerance screening in a randomized controlled trial? An international survey of current practice and clinician equipoise.
J Perinatol. 2022 Apr;42(4):507-509. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01167-7. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics.对汽车安全座椅耐受性筛查的依从性因适应证和患者特征而异。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Nov;25(11):1707-1716. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Car Seat Tolerance Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Failure Rates, Risk Factors, and Adverse Outcomes.新生儿重症监护病房中汽车安全座椅的耐受性筛查:失败率、风险因素和不良结局。
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:60-66.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Is the infant car seat challenge useful? A pilot study in a simulated moving vehicle.婴儿汽车安全座椅挑战是否有用?在模拟行驶车辆中的一项初步研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Mar;102(2):F136-F141. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310730. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Factors associated with car seat test failure in late preterm infants: A retrospective chart review.晚期早产儿汽车座椅测试失败的相关因素:一项回顾性图表审查。
Paediatr Child Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):16-20.
8
Screening for cardiopulmonary events in neonates: a review of the infant car seat challenge.新生儿心肺事件筛查:婴儿汽车座椅挑战综述
J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;35(4):235-40. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.1. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Car seat safety: literature review.汽车座椅安全:文献综述
Neonatal Netw. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):29-31. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.24.2.29.
2
Early NICU discharge of very low birth weight infants: a critical review and analysis.极低出生体重儿早期从新生儿重症监护病房出院:一项批判性综述与分析。
Semin Neonatol. 2003 Apr;8(2):95-115. doi: 10.1016/S1084-2756(02)00219-1.
3
Car seat challenges: where are we in implementation of these programs?汽车座椅面临的挑战:我们在这些项目的实施方面进展如何?
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Apr-Jun;17(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200304000-00008.
4
Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates.宫外生长受限仍是早产新生儿面临的一个严重问题。
Pediatrics. 2003 May;111(5 Pt 1):986-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.5.986.
5
Inter-neonatal intensive care unit variation in discharge timing: influence of apnea and feeding management.新生儿重症监护病房之间出院时间的差异:呼吸暂停和喂养管理的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):928-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.928.
6
Respiratory instability of term and near-term healthy newborn infants in car safety seats.足月儿和近足月儿健康新生儿在汽车安全座椅中的呼吸不稳定情况。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):647-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.647.
7
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention. Safe transportation of newborns at hospital discharge.
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4 Pt 1):986-7.
8
Frequency and timing of recurrent events in infants using home cardiorespiratory monitors.使用家庭心肺监测仪的婴儿复发性事件的频率和时间
J Pediatr. 1998 May;132(5):783-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70304-x.
9
Apnea frequently persists beyond term gestation in infants delivered at 24 to 28 weeks.在24至28周出生的婴儿中,呼吸暂停常常在足月妊娠后仍持续存在。
Pediatrics. 1997 Sep;100(3 Pt 1):354-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.3.354.
10
Predischarge respiratory recordings in very low birth weight newborn infants.极低出生体重新生儿出院前的呼吸记录。
J Pediatr. 1996 Dec;129(6):934-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70044-6.

出院前“汽车座椅挑战”对预防早产儿发病和死亡的作用

Pre-discharge "car seat challenge" for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

作者信息

Pilley E, McGuire W

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD005386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005386.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005386.pub2
PMID:16437530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9016792/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physiological monitoring studies indicate that some preterm infants experience episodes of oxygen desaturation, apnoea, or bradycardia when seated in standard car safety seats. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all preterm infants should be assessed for cardiorespiratory stability in their car seat prior to discharge - the "car seat challenge". We aimed to assess the evidence to support this practice, specifically to determine whether the use of the car seat challenge prevents morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the available evidence from randomised controlled trials that pre-discharge cardiorespiratory monitoring in a car safety seat prevents morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 - September 2005), EMBASE (1980 - September 2005), CINAHL (1982 - September 2005), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared pre-discharge cardiorespiratory monitoring in a car seat versus no monitoring in preterm infants in the week prior to planned discharge from hospital.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors, and synthesis of data using relative risk, risk difference and weighted mean difference.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not find any randomised controlled trials that fulfilled the eligibility criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether undertaking a pre-discharge car seat challenge is beneficial or harmful to preterm infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether the car seat challenge accurately predicts the risk of clinically significant adverse events in preterm infants travelling in car seats. If this is shown to be the case then a large randomised controlled trial is needed to provide an unbiased assessment of its utility in pre-discharge assessment.

摘要

背景

生理监测研究表明,一些早产儿坐在标准汽车安全座椅上时会出现氧饱和度下降、呼吸暂停或心动过缓的情况。美国儿科学会建议,所有早产儿在出院前都应在汽车座椅上进行心肺稳定性评估——即“汽车座椅挑战”。我们旨在评估支持这一做法的证据,特别是确定进行汽车座椅挑战是否能预防早产儿的发病和死亡。

目的

评估随机对照试验的现有证据,即出院前在汽车安全座椅上进行心肺监测能否预防早产儿的发病和死亡。

检索策略

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略。这包括检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,《Cochrane图书馆》,2005年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2005年9月)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年9月)、CINAHL(1982年至2005年9月)、会议论文集以及以往的综述。

选择标准

比较计划出院前一周早产儿在汽车座椅上进行出院前心肺监测与未进行监测的随机或半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,由两名综述作者分别评估试验质量和提取数据,并使用相对危险度、危险度差值和加权均数差值进行数据合成。

主要结果

我们未找到任何符合纳入标准的随机对照试验。

作者结论

目前尚不清楚出院前进行汽车座椅挑战对早产儿是有益还是有害。需要进一步研究以确定汽车座椅挑战能否准确预测早产儿乘坐汽车座椅时发生具有临床意义的不良事件的风险。如果情况确实如此,那么需要进行一项大型随机对照试验,以公正评估其在出院前评估中的效用。