Pilley E, McGuire W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD005386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005386.pub2.
Physiological monitoring studies indicate that some preterm infants experience episodes of oxygen desaturation, apnoea, or bradycardia when seated in standard car safety seats. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all preterm infants should be assessed for cardiorespiratory stability in their car seat prior to discharge - the "car seat challenge". We aimed to assess the evidence to support this practice, specifically to determine whether the use of the car seat challenge prevents morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
To assess the available evidence from randomised controlled trials that pre-discharge cardiorespiratory monitoring in a car safety seat prevents morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 - September 2005), EMBASE (1980 - September 2005), CINAHL (1982 - September 2005), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared pre-discharge cardiorespiratory monitoring in a car seat versus no monitoring in preterm infants in the week prior to planned discharge from hospital.
The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors, and synthesis of data using relative risk, risk difference and weighted mean difference.
We did not find any randomised controlled trials that fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether undertaking a pre-discharge car seat challenge is beneficial or harmful to preterm infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether the car seat challenge accurately predicts the risk of clinically significant adverse events in preterm infants travelling in car seats. If this is shown to be the case then a large randomised controlled trial is needed to provide an unbiased assessment of its utility in pre-discharge assessment.
生理监测研究表明,一些早产儿坐在标准汽车安全座椅上时会出现氧饱和度下降、呼吸暂停或心动过缓的情况。美国儿科学会建议,所有早产儿在出院前都应在汽车座椅上进行心肺稳定性评估——即“汽车座椅挑战”。我们旨在评估支持这一做法的证据,特别是确定进行汽车座椅挑战是否能预防早产儿的发病和死亡。
评估随机对照试验的现有证据,即出院前在汽车安全座椅上进行心肺监测能否预防早产儿的发病和死亡。
我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略。这包括检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,《Cochrane图书馆》,2005年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2005年9月)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年9月)、CINAHL(1982年至2005年9月)、会议论文集以及以往的综述。
比较计划出院前一周早产儿在汽车座椅上进行出院前心肺监测与未进行监测的随机或半随机对照试验。
采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,由两名综述作者分别评估试验质量和提取数据,并使用相对危险度、危险度差值和加权均数差值进行数据合成。
我们未找到任何符合纳入标准的随机对照试验。
目前尚不清楚出院前进行汽车座椅挑战对早产儿是有益还是有害。需要进一步研究以确定汽车座椅挑战能否准确预测早产儿乘坐汽车座椅时发生具有临床意义的不良事件的风险。如果情况确实如此,那么需要进行一项大型随机对照试验,以公正评估其在出院前评估中的效用。