Atkinson R M, Lipuma J J, Rosenbluth D B, Dunne W M
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8118, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):833-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.833-836.2006.
Pandoraea apista is recovered with increasing frequency from the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and may represent an emerging pathogen (I. M. Jorgensen et al., Pediatr. Pulmonol. 36:439-446, 2003). We identified two CF patients from our hospital whose sputum specimens were culture positive for P. apista over the course of several years. Repetitive-element-sequence PCR was employed to determine whether sequential isolates that were recovered from these patients represented a single clone and whether each patient had been chronically colonized with the same strain. Banding patterns generated with ERIC primers, REP primers, and BOX primers showed that individual patient isolates had a high degree of similarity (>97%) and were considered identical. However, only the banding patterns from the ERIC primers and BOX primers were able to show that the strains from patients I and II were unique (similarity indices of 79.8% and 70.0%, respectively). We concluded that all strains of P. apista from patient I were identical, as were all strains from patient II, establishing chronic colonization. Only two of the three methods employed indicate that the strains from the two patients are distinct. This implied that the organism was not transferred from one patient to the other, suggesting that the choice of methodology could generate misleading results when examining person-to-person transmission regarding this organism.
潘多拉阿皮斯塔菌从囊性纤维化(CF)患者的肺部分离出来的频率越来越高,可能是一种新出现的病原体(I.M. 乔根森等人,《儿科肺病学》36:439 - 446,2003年)。我们从本院确定了两名CF患者,他们的痰液标本在数年中经培养对阿皮斯塔菌呈阳性。采用重复元件序列PCR来确定从这些患者身上分离出的连续菌株是否代表单个克隆,以及每位患者是否一直被同一菌株定植。用ERIC引物、REP引物和BOX引物产生的条带模式表明,单个患者的分离株具有高度相似性(>97%),被认为是相同的。然而,只有ERIC引物和BOX引物产生的条带模式能够表明来自患者I和患者II的菌株是独特的(相似性指数分别为79.8%和70.0%)。我们得出结论,患者I的所有阿皮斯塔菌菌株是相同的,患者II的所有菌株也是相同的,证实了慢性定植。所采用的三种方法中只有两种表明两名患者的菌株是不同的。这意味着该微生物没有从一名患者传播到另一名患者,表明在检查关于这种微生物的人际传播时,方法的选择可能会产生误导性结果。