在贫困地区的医疗机构中，总体治疗效果框架得分较低。
Overall quality of outcomes framework scores lower in practices in deprived areas.
作者信息
Wright Jim, Martin David, Cockings Samantha, Polack Clare
机构信息
School of Geography, University of Southampton.
出版信息
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Apr;56(525):277-9.
Abstract
There has been much debate as to whether quality points allocated through the new general medical services contract are more difficult to achieve for practices in deprived and rural areas. We used multiple regression to assess the relationships between deprivation, rurality and the number of overall quality points achieved by each practice. Multiple deprivation was significantly inversely related to quality points achieved. Practices in villages and towns gained 2% more quality points than urban areas and hamlets.
摘要
关于通过新的全科医疗服务合同分配的质量分数对于贫困和农村地区的医疗机构而言是否更难实现，一直存在诸多争议。我们运用多元回归分析来评估贫困程度、乡村属性与每个医疗机构所获得的总体质量分数之间的关系。多重贫困与所获得的质量分数显著负相关。乡镇地区的医疗机构比城市地区和小村庄的医疗机构多获得2%的质量分数。
相似文献
1
Overall quality of outcomes framework scores lower in practices in deprived areas.在贫困地区的医疗机构中，总体治疗效果框架得分较低。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Apr;56(525):277-9.
2
Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study.根据英国新合同衡量的基层医疗服务质量的决定因素：横断面研究
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):389-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38742.554468.55. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
3
Does distance matter? Geographical variation in GP out-of-hours service use: an observational study.距离重要吗？全科医生非工作时间服务使用情况的地理差异：一项观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jul;58(552):471-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319431.
4
Practice size and quality attainment under the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis.新全科医生服务合同下的诊所规模与质量达标情况：一项横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):830-5.
5
Differences in the quality of primary medical care services by remoteness from urban settlements.根据与城市定居点的距离，初级医疗服务质量存在差异。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):446-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020875.
6
Rural-Urban Differences in Medicare Quality Scores Persist After Adjusting for Sociodemographic and Environmental Characteristics.农村-城市间的医疗保险质量评分差异在调整社会人口学和环境特征后仍然存在。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jan;35(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12261. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
7
The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.全科医疗特征与医疗质量之间的关系：对2004 - 2005年英国质量与结果框架中使用的质量指标的全国性调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68.
8
Improving quality in general practice: qualitative case study of barriers faced by health authorities.提高全科医疗质量：卫生当局面临的障碍的定性案例研究
BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):164-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7203.164.
9
Quality of hospice care: comparison between rural and urban residents.临终关怀质量：农村居民与城市居民的比较。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2015 Jul-Sep;30(3):247-53. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000108.
10
Socio-economic deprivation is associated with increased proximity to general practices in England: an ecological analysis.社会经济剥夺与英格兰地区距离全科医疗服务机构更近相关：一项生态分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Mar;27(1):80-1. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh210. Epub 2005 Jan 6.
引用本文的文献
1
Deprivation and primary care funding in Greater Manchester after devolution: a cross-sectional analysis.在权力下放后大曼彻斯特的剥夺和初级保健资金：横断面分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 31;69(688):e794-e800. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705545. Print 2019 Nov.
2
Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data.贫困地区的比较发病率及医院急诊入院病例占比：基于英国行政数据的方法与证据
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):e022573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022573.
3
A cross-sectional ecological analysis of international and sub-national health inequalities in commercial geospatial resource availability.跨国别和国家级的商业地理空间资源可及性与健康不平等的横断生态学分析。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 May 23;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0134-z.
4
Assessing Impacts on Unplanned Hospitalisations of Care Quality and Access Using a Structural Equation Method: With a Case Study of Diabetes.使用结构方程法评估护理质量和可及性对非计划住院的影响：以糖尿病为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 1;13(9):870. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090870.
5
Impact of 'stretch' targets for cardiovascular disease management within a local pay-for-performance programme.当地绩效付费计划中心血管疾病管理“拉伸”目标的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0119185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119185. eCollection 2015.
6
The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.评价质量和结果框架中的公平性维度：系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 31;11:209. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-209.
7
Which factors are associated with higher rates of chronic kidney disease recording in primary care? A cross-sectional survey of GP practices.哪些因素与初级保健中慢性肾脏病记录率较高相关？全科医生实践的横断面调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Mar;61(584):203-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X561212.
8
Rurality and event-free survival in patients with heart failure.农村地区与心力衰竭患者的无事件生存。
Heart Lung. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):512-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.11.002.
9
Estimating prevalence of coronary heart disease for small areas using collateral indicators of morbidity.利用发病率的间接指标估计小范围冠心病的患病率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):164-77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7010164. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
10
Pay for performance in primary care: proceed with caution, pitfalls ahead.基层医疗中的绩效薪酬：谨慎前行，前方有陷阱。
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):10-22.
本文引用的文献
1
Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53,000 patients in primary care.贫困、种族和性别与糖尿病质量指标的关联：基于53000名初级保健患者的人群调查
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1267-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38279.588125.7C. Epub 2004 Nov 17.
2
The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 and accessibility effects on health.2000年多重贫困指数及可达性对健康的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Mar;58(3):250-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.013011.
3
Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK.医疗保健服务的可及性公平性：来自英国的理论与证据
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(9):1149-62. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00415-9.
Zotero 插件