Kibi Government Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 May 23;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0134-z.
Commercial geospatial data resources are frequently used to understand healthcare utilisation. Although there is widespread evidence of a digital divide for other digital resources and infra-structure, it is unclear how commercial geospatial data resources are distributed relative to health need.
To examine the distribution of commercial geospatial data resources relative to health needs, we assembled coverage and quality metrics for commercial geocoding, neighbourhood characterisation, and travel time calculation resources for 183 countries. We developed a country-level, composite index of commercial geospatial data quality/availability and examined its distribution relative to age-standardised all-cause and cause specific (for three main causes of death) mortality using two inequality metrics, the slope index of inequality and relative concentration index. In two sub-national case studies, we also examined geocoding success rates versus area deprivation by district in Eastern Region, Ghana and Lagos State, Nigeria.
Internationally, commercial geospatial data resources were inversely related to all-cause mortality. This relationship was more pronounced when examining mortality due to communicable diseases. Commercial geospatial data resources for calculating patient travel times were more equitably distributed relative to health need than resources for characterising neighbourhoods or geocoding patient addresses. Countries such as South Africa have comparatively high commercial geospatial data availability despite high mortality, whilst countries such as South Korea have comparatively low data availability and low mortality. Sub-nationally, evidence was mixed as to whether geocoding success was lowest in more deprived districts.
To our knowledge, this is the first global analysis of commercial geospatial data resources in relation to health outcomes. In countries such as South Africa where there is high mortality but also comparatively rich commercial geospatial data, these data resources are a potential resource for examining healthcare utilisation that requires further evaluation. In countries such as Sierra Leone where there is high mortality but minimal commercial geospatial data, alternative approaches such as open data use are needed in quantifying patient travel times, geocoding patient addresses, and characterising patients' neighbourhoods.
商业地理空间数据资源常用于了解医疗保健的利用情况。尽管其他数字资源和基础设施存在广泛的数字鸿沟证据,但尚不清楚商业地理空间数据资源相对于健康需求的分布情况。
为了研究商业地理空间数据资源相对于健康需求的分布情况,我们为 183 个国家/地区的商业地理编码、邻里特征和出行时间计算资源收集了覆盖范围和质量指标。我们开发了一个国家层面的商业地理空间数据质量/可用性综合指数,并使用两个不平等指标(不平等斜率指数和相对集中指数),根据年龄标准化的全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率(三种主要死因)来研究其分布情况。在两个次国家级案例研究中,我们还根据加纳东部地区和尼日利亚拉各斯州的地区贫困程度,研究了地理编码成功率与面积的关系。
在国际上,商业地理空间数据资源与全因死亡率呈反比关系。当研究传染病死亡率时,这种关系更为明显。计算患者出行时间的商业地理空间数据资源相对于健康需求的分配更为公平,而描述邻里特征或地理编码患者地址的资源则不然。南非等国尽管死亡率较高,但商业地理空间数据的可用性却相对较高,而韩国等国数据可用性较低,死亡率也较低。在次国家级,地理编码成功率是否在较贫困的地区最低,证据不一。
据我们所知,这是首次对商业地理空间数据资源与健康结果的全球分析。在南非等国,尽管死亡率较高,但商业地理空间数据资源也相对丰富,这些数据资源是研究医疗保健利用情况的潜在资源,需要进一步评估。在塞拉利昂等国,尽管死亡率较高,但商业地理空间数据极少,需要采取开放数据使用等替代方法来量化患者的出行时间、地理编码患者地址和描述患者的邻里特征。