Colón-Cesario Melissa, Wang Jianpeng, Ramos Xiomara, García Hermes G, Dávila Jorge J, Laguna Jessenia, Rosado Claribel, Peña de Ortiz Sandra
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, 00931-3360, Puerto Rico.
J Neurosci. 2006 May 17;26(20):5524-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3050-05.2006.
Genomic recombination requires cutting, processing, and rejoining of DNA by endonucleases, polymerases, and ligases, among other factors. We have proposed that DNA recombination mechanisms may contribute to long-term memory (LTM) formation in the brain. Our previous studies with the nucleoside analog 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine triphosphate (ara-CTP), a known inhibitor of DNA ligases and polymerases, showed that this agent blocked consolidation of conditioned taste aversion without interfering with short-term memory (STM). However, because polymerases and ligases are also essential for DNA replication, it remained unclear whether the effects of this drug on consolidation were attributable to interference with DNA recombination or neurogenesis. Here we show, using C57BL/6 mice, that ara-CTP specifically blocks consolidation but not STM of context fear conditioning, a task previously shown not to require neurogenesis. The effects of a single systemic dose of cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) on LTM were evident as early as 6 h after training. In addition, although ara-C impaired LTM, it did not impair general locomotor activity nor induce brain neurotoxicity. Importantly, hippocampal, but not insular cortex, infusions of ara-C also blocked consolidation of context fear conditioning. Separate studies revealed that context fear conditioning training significantly induced nonhomologous DNA end joining activity indicative of DNA ligase-dependent recombination in hippocampal, but not cortex, protein extracts. Finally, unlike inhibition of protein synthesis, systemic ara-C did not block reconsolidation of context fear conditioning. Our results support the idea that DNA recombination is a process specific to consolidation that is not involved in the postreactivation editing of memories.
基因组重组需要核酸内切酶、聚合酶和连接酶等对DNA进行切割、加工和重新连接等,还有其他一些因素。我们已经提出,DNA重组机制可能有助于大脑中长时记忆(LTM)的形成。我们之前使用核苷类似物1-β-D-阿拉伯呋喃糖基胞嘧啶三磷酸(ara-CTP)进行的研究,ara-CTP是一种已知的DNA连接酶和聚合酶抑制剂,结果表明该药物可阻断条件性味觉厌恶的巩固,而不干扰短时记忆(STM)。然而,由于聚合酶和连接酶对DNA复制也至关重要,因此该药物对巩固的影响是归因于对DNA重组的干扰还是神经发生仍不清楚。在这里,我们使用C57BL/6小鼠表明,ara-CTP特异性地阻断情境恐惧条件反射的巩固,而不阻断其短时记忆,之前的研究表明该任务不需要神经发生。单次全身剂量的阿糖胞苷(ara-C)对长时记忆的影响早在训练后6小时就很明显。此外,虽然ara-C损害了长时记忆,但它并没有损害一般运动活动,也没有诱导脑神经毒性。重要的是,海马体而非岛叶皮质注射ara-C也阻断了情境恐惧条件反射的巩固。单独的研究表明,情境恐惧条件反射训练显著诱导了海马体而非皮质蛋白质提取物中指示DNA连接酶依赖性重组的非同源DNA末端连接活性。最后,与抑制蛋白质合成不同,全身注射ara-C并没有阻断情境恐惧条件反射的重新巩固。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即DNA重组是巩固过程所特有的,不参与记忆重新激活后的编辑。