Gollwitzer H, Diehl P, Gerdesmeyer L, Mittelmeier W
Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Prof.-Küntscher-Strasse 8, 82418, Murnau/Staffelsee.
Orthopade. 2006 Sep;35(9):904, 906-8, 910-6. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0977-z.
Reliable confirmation of periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty is a diagnostic challenge. The present work reviews published data evaluating the available diagnostic tools. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein serum levels are relatively sensitive methods with rather low specificity towards periprosthetic infection and are mainly applied to exclude infection. Studies evaluating scintigraphic methods--especially white cell scans--provide inconsistent data with varying accuracy. Consequently, white cell scans cannot be recommended as standard methods. Immunoscintigraphy with antigranulocyte antibodies and FDG-PET scans demonstrated promising results with particularly high sensitivities, but have to be validated in larger studies. Microbiological evaluation of joint aspirates proved high specificity for periprosthetic infection. However, an average of 20% of infected cases remained undetected. Nevertheless, aspiration is widely recommended for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism. Intraoperative frozen sections demonstrated excellent specificity with good sensitivity. The real accuracy of intraoperative culture and permanent histology cannot be determined due to the missing golden standard; however, a combination of both methods is recommended to define the final diagnosis. Large studies validating both methods and criteria for the final diagnosis of periprosthetic infection are necessary to optimize the diagnostic algorithm.
全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的可靠确诊是一项诊断挑战。本研究回顾了已发表的评估现有诊断工具的数据。红细胞沉降率和血清C反应蛋白水平是相对敏感的方法,但对假体周围感染的特异性较低,主要用于排除感染。评估闪烁扫描法——尤其是白细胞扫描——的研究提供的数据不一致,准确性各异。因此,白细胞扫描不能作为标准方法推荐。使用抗粒细胞抗体的免疫闪烁扫描和FDG-PET扫描显示出有前景的结果,敏感性特别高,但必须在更大规模的研究中进行验证。关节穿刺液的微生物学评估对假体周围感染具有高特异性。然而,平均有20%的感染病例未被检测到。尽管如此,穿刺抽吸仍被广泛推荐用于术前分离感染病原体。术中冰冻切片显示出极佳的特异性和良好的敏感性。由于缺乏金标准,无法确定术中培养和永久组织学检查的实际准确性;然而,建议将这两种方法结合起来以确定最终诊断。有必要开展大规模研究来验证这两种方法以及假体周围感染最终诊断的标准,以优化诊断算法。