Suppr超能文献

核成像评估人工膝关节周围感染的准确性如何?一项荟萃分析。

What is the Accuracy of Nuclear Imaging in the Assessment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Verberne Steven J, Sonnega Remko J A, Temmerman Olivier P P, Raijmakers Pieter G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, NWZ, The Netherlands.

The Centre for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar (CORAL), Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1395-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5218-0. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the assessment of possible periprosthetic knee infection, various imaging modalities are used without consensus regarding the most accurate technique.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of various applied imaging modalities in the assessment of periprosthetic knee infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with the PRISMA and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) recommendations to identify clinical studies in which periprosthetic knee infection was investigated with different imaging modalities. The sensitivity and specificity of each imaging technique were determined and compared with the results of microbiologic and histologic analyses, intraoperative findings, and clinical followup of more than 6 months. A total of 23 studies, published between 1990 and 2015, were included for meta-analysis, representing 1027 diagnostic images of symptomatic knee prostheses. Quality of the included studies showed low concerns regarding external validity, whereas internal validity indicated more concerns regarding the risk of bias. The most important concerns were found in the lack of uniform criteria for the diagnosis of a periprosthetic infection and the flow and timing of the included studies. Differences among techniques were tested at a probability less than 0.05 level. Where there was slight overlap of confidence intervals for two means, it is possible for the point estimates to be statistically different from one another at a probability less than 0.05. The z-test was used to statistically analyze differences in these situations.

RESULTS

Bone scintigraphy was less specific than all other modalities tested (56%; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64; p < 0.001), and leukocyte scintigraphy (77%; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85) was less specific than antigranulocyte scintigraphy (95%; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98; p < 0.001) or combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy (93%; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97; p < 0.001). Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) (84%; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) was more specific than bone scintigraphy (56%; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64; p < 0.001), and less specific than antigranulocyte scintigraphy (95%; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98; p = 0.02) and combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy (93%; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97; p < 0.001). Leukocyte scintigraphy (88%; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93; p = 0.01) and antigranulocyte scintigraphy (90%; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; p = 0.02) were more sensitive than FGD-PET (70%; 95% CI, 0.56-0.81). However, because of broad overlapping of confidence intervals, no differences in sensitivity were observed among the other modalities, including combined bone scintigraphy (93%; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98) or combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy (80%; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91; p > 0.05 for all paired comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, antigranulocyte scintigraphy and combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy appear to be highly specific imaging modalities in confirming periprosthetic knee infection. Bone scintigraphy was a highly sensitive imaging technique but lacks the specificity needed to differentiate among various conditions that cause painful knee prostheses. FDG-PET may not be the preferred imaging modality because it is more expensive and not more effective in confirming periprosthetic knee infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

在评估可能的人工膝关节周围感染时,会使用多种成像方式,但对于最准确的技术尚无共识。

问题/目的:进行一项荟萃分析,以比较各种应用的成像方式在评估人工膝关节周围感染时的准确性。

方法

按照PRISMA和诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)建议,对MEDLINE和Embase进行全面检索,进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以识别使用不同成像方式研究人工膝关节周围感染的临床研究。确定每种成像技术的敏感性和特异性,并与微生物学和组织学分析结果、术中发现以及超过6个月的临床随访结果进行比较。共有1990年至2015年间发表的23项研究纳入荟萃分析,代表了1027例有症状膝关节假体的诊断图像。纳入研究的质量显示对外在有效性的担忧较低,而内在有效性表明对偏倚风险的担忧更多。发现最重要的问题在于缺乏人工关节周围感染诊断的统一标准以及纳入研究的流程和时间安排。技术之间的差异在概率小于0.05水平进行检验。当两个均值的置信区间存在轻微重叠时,点估计值在概率小于0.05时可能在统计学上彼此不同。在这些情况下使用z检验进行统计学差异分析。

结果

骨闪烁显像的特异性低于所有其他测试方式(56%;95%CI,0.47 - 0.64;p < 0.001),白细胞闪烁显像(77%;95%CI,0.69 - 0.85)的特异性低于抗粒细胞闪烁显像(95%;95%CI,0.88 - 0.98;p < 0.001)或白细胞与骨髓联合闪烁显像(93%;95%CI,0.86 - 0.97;p < 0.001)。氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)(84%;95%CI,0.76 - 0.90)的特异性高于骨闪烁显像(56%;95%CI,0.47 - 0.64;p < 0.001),但低于抗粒细胞闪烁显像(95%;95%CI,0.88 - 0.98;p = 0.02)和白细胞与骨髓联合闪烁显像(93%;95%CI,0.86 - 0.97;p < 0.001)。白细胞闪烁显像(88%;95%CI,0.81 - 0.93;p = 0.01)和抗粒细胞闪烁显像(90%;95%CI,0.78 - 0.96;p = 0.02)比FDG-PET(70%;95%CI,0.56 - 0.81)更敏感。然而,由于置信区间广泛重叠,在包括联合骨闪烁显像(93%;95%CI,0.85 - 0.98)或白细胞与骨髓联合闪烁显像(80%;95%CI,0.66 - 0.91;所有配对比较p > 0.05)在内的其他方式之间未观察到敏感性差异。

结论

基于当前证据,抗粒细胞闪烁显像和白细胞与骨髓联合闪烁显像似乎是确认人工膝关节周围感染的高度特异性成像方式。骨闪烁显像是一种高度敏感成像技术,但缺乏区分导致膝关节假体疼痛的各种情况所需的特异性。FDG-PET可能不是首选成像方式,因为它更昂贵且在确认人工膝关节周围感染方面并不更有效。证据水平:III级,诊断性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b5/5384926/48f5e07eb797/11999_2016_5218_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the Accuracy of Nuclear Imaging in the Assessment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? A Meta-analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1395-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5218-0. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
9
Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 6;8(8):CD015064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015064.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 30;13(8):1855. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081855.
2
Imaging in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 24;13(1):10. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010010.
5
EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [F]FDG hybrid PET use in infection and inflammation in adults v2.0.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Jan;52(2):510-538. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06915-3. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jun 30;16:120308. doi: 10.52965/001c.120308. eCollection 2024.
8
Management of periprosthetic knee joint infections: focus on the role of Nuclear Medicine (v2).
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Nov 12;14(4):39646. doi: 10.52965/001c.39646. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
[Screening with angiographic images prior to (99m)Tc-HMPAO labelled leukocyte scintigraphy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection].
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2014.10.003. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
4
Prosthesis infection: diagnosis after total joint arthroplasty with three-phase bone scintigraphy.
Ann Nucl Med. 2014 Dec;28(10):994-1003. doi: 10.1007/s12149-014-0899-5. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
5
Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: Past, present, and future.
World J Radiol. 2014 Jul 28;6(7):446-58. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.446.
6
The alpha-defensin test for periprosthetic joint infection outperforms the leukocyte esterase test strip.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):198-203. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3722-7.
10
Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2 Suppl):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.040. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验