• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用绝对阈值敏感性与校正阈值敏感性的逐点线性回归分析检测视野进展。

Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.

作者信息

Manassakorn Anita, Nouri-Mahdavi Kouros, Koucheki Behrooz, Law Simon K, Caprioli Joseph

机构信息

Glaucoma Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2896-903. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1079.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.05-1079
PMID:16799031
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of point-wise linear regression analysis (PLR) with total deviation (TD) versus corrected or pattern deviation (PD) threshold sensitivities for detection of visual field progression.

METHODS

Four hundred two eyes (402 patients) enrolled in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) were selected. Criteria for progression according to PLR were a slope<or=-1 dB/year with P<or=0.01 with >or=2 worsening points within the same Glaucoma Hemifield Test cluster. PLR was performed on TD and PD threshold sensitivities and compared to clinical evaluation. Eyes were classified into three groups based on mean deviation (MD): mild (MD>or=-6 dB), moderately advanced (-6 dB>MD>or=-12 dB), and advanced (MD<-12 dB) glaucoma.

RESULTS

Visual field progression was observed in 154 (38%), 85 (21%), and 175 (44%) eyes, according to PLR(TD) and PLR(PD), and clinical evaluation. The pair-wise agreement between clinicians and PLR(TD) was significantly greater than that of clinicians and PLR(PD) (kappa=0.48, 95% CI: 0.44-0.52 vs. kappa=0.31, 95% CI: 0.27-0.35). Agreement between PLR(TD) and PLR(PD) decreased with increasing glaucoma severity: kappa (95% CI)=0.60 (0.52-0.67), 0.41 (0.35-0.47), and 0.33 (0.27-0.40) for mild, moderately advanced, and advanced glaucoma, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Point-wise linear regression analysis on TD threshold sensitivities performed better than the same analysis on PD when clinical evaluation was used as a reference. Agreement between the two methods was less in moderately advanced and advanced glaucoma.

摘要

目的

比较逐点线性回归分析(PLR)采用总偏差(TD)与校正或模式偏差(PD)阈值敏感度检测视野进展的性能。

方法

选取参加高级青光眼干预研究(AGIS)的402只眼(402例患者)。根据PLR,进展标准为斜率≤ -1 dB/年,P≤0.01,且在同一青光眼半视野检测簇内有≥2个恶化点。对TD和PD阈值敏感度进行PLR,并与临床评估进行比较。根据平均偏差(MD)将眼部分为三组:轻度青光眼(MD≥ -6 dB)、中度进展性青光眼(-6 dB>MD≥ -12 dB)和重度青光眼(MD< -12 dB)。

结果

根据PLR(TD)、PLR(PD)和临床评估,分别在154只眼(38%)、85只眼(21%)和175只眼(44%)中观察到视野进展。临床医生与PLR(TD)之间的两两一致性显著高于临床医生与PLR(PD)之间的一致性(kappa = 0.48,95%CI:0.44 - 0.52 vs. kappa = 0.31,95%CI:0.27 - 0.35)。PLR(TD)与PLR(PD)之间的一致性随青光眼严重程度增加而降低:轻度、中度进展性和重度青光眼的kappa(95%CI)分别为0.60(0.52 - 0.67)、0.41(0.35 - 0.47)和0.33(0.27 - 0.40)。

结论

以临床评估为参考时,对TD阈值敏感度进行逐点线性回归分析的性能优于对PD进行的相同分析。两种方法在中度进展性和重度青光眼中的一致性较低。

相似文献

1
Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.采用绝对阈值敏感性与校正阈值敏感性的逐点线性回归分析检测视野进展。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2896-903. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1079.
2
Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.青光眼进展干预研究中青光眼性视野进展的预测因素。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Sep;111(9):1627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.017.
3
Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.青光眼的视野进展:总体偏差与模式偏差分析
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4600-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0827.
4
Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.青光眼患者中矩阵频率加倍技术和标准自动视野计的阈值及变异性特征
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0135.
5
Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.青光眼自动视野进展性变化分析
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jun;37(7):1419-28.
6
Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.用于确定青光眼视野缺损进展的方法的诊断准确性的统计学评估。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):2117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.025.
7
Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.基于人群的青光眼患病率调查中倍频技术视野检查的表现:田美研究
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.041. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods.用于评估视野结果并与高级青光眼干预研究方法进行比较的逐点线性回归
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):193-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.193.
9
A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients.早期显性青光眼试验患者中3项主要青光眼试验的视野进展标准比较。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.在晚期青光眼干预研究中,眼压波动是低眼压状态下视野进展的一个风险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1123-1129.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.031. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
To compare central visual field progression using mean deviation and pointwise linear regression analysis.比较平均偏差和逐点线性回归分析的中心视野进展。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;71(3):854-860. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1737_22.
2
Point-wise variability of threshold sensitivity of 24-2 and 10-2 visual fields.24-2和10-2视野阈值敏感度的逐点变异性。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 26;12(2):170-177. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_10_22. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
3
Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data.
利用基于纵向视野和临床数据的机器学习评估青光眼进展。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul;128(7):1016-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.020. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
4
Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.青光眼的功能评估:揭示进展。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;65(6):639-661. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
5
Long Term Results of Visual Field Progression Analysis in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients Under Treatment.开角型青光眼患者治疗中视野进展分析的长期结果
Open Ophthalmol J. 2015 Jun 26;9:116-20. doi: 10.2174/1874364101509010116. eCollection 2015.
6
Nonlinear Trend Analysis of Longitudinal Pointwise Visual Field Sensitivity in Suspected and Early Glaucoma.疑似和早期青光眼纵向逐点视野敏感度的非线性趋势分析
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 10;4(1):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.1.8. eCollection 2015 Feb.
7
Prediction of glaucomatous visual field progression: pointwise analysis.青光眼视野进展的预测:逐点分析
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Jul;39(7):705-10. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.867353.
8
Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.治疗对高眼压治疗研究观察组视野变化率的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr 2;53(4):1704-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8186.
9
The rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study.青光眼治疗研究中的视野变化率。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):224-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7117.
10
Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications.用标准的无色视野计检测青光眼的视野进展:综述及实际意义。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;249(11):1593-616. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1787-5. Epub 2011 Aug 26.