Pappas S, Nikolopoulos T P, Korres S, Papacharalampous G, Tzangarulakis A, Ferekidis E
1st ENT Department, Hippokratio General Hospital, Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Sep;60(9):1115-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01005.x.
A discharging ear is a very common condition for the general practitioner and the ENT surgeon. Oral and intravenous antibiotics have potential complications, are costly, and exhibit increasing resistance. This study explores the advantages and disadvantages of all common otic preparations and compares effectiveness, safety, cost and complication rates. In chronic otitis media (chronic discharging ears), topical antibiotics seem to be the treatment of choice by comparison with oral or intravenous antibiotics. Cultures and antibiograms do not correspond directly to clinical efficacy, as laboratory determination of resistance does not take into account the high concentration of antibiotics in local preparations. It is safer to use quinolone drops as a first-line treatment, but it is still possible to use short courses of other drops if quinolones are either unavailable or contraindicated (e.g. allergy), or when bacteria are resistant to them. However, in such a situation, a round window membrane involved in an established inflammatory process and therefore less permeable to the passage of topical preparations is the preferred setting, as ototoxicity is a potential complication, especially in the case of gentamicin, in which case patients should be warned accordingly.
耳部流脓对于全科医生和耳鼻喉科外科医生来说是一种非常常见的病症。口服和静脉注射抗生素存在潜在并发症,成本高昂,且耐药性日益增加。本研究探讨了所有常见耳部制剂的优缺点,并比较了有效性、安全性、成本和并发症发生率。在慢性中耳炎(慢性耳部流脓)中,与口服或静脉注射抗生素相比,局部用抗生素似乎是首选治疗方法。培养和药敏试验结果与临床疗效并不直接对应,因为实验室测定的耐药性并未考虑局部制剂中抗生素的高浓度。将喹诺酮类滴剂作为一线治疗用药更安全,但如果没有喹诺酮类药物或存在禁忌情况(如过敏),或者细菌对其耐药时,仍可使用其他滴剂的短疗程治疗。然而,在这种情况下,由于耳毒性是一种潜在并发症,尤其是使用庆大霉素时,在这种情况下应相应地警告患者,因此,参与既定炎症过程且因此对局部制剂的渗透较不敏感的圆窗膜是首选部位。