Snyder Lawrence H, Dickinson Anthony R, Calton Jeffrey L
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10091-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0513-06.2006.
To acquire something that we see, visual spatial information must ultimately result in the activation of the appropriate set of muscles. This sensory to motor transformation requires an interaction between information coding target location and information coding which effector will be moved. Activity in the monkey parietal reach region (PRR) reflects both spatial information and the effector (arm or eye) that will be used in an upcoming reach or saccade task. To further elucidate the functional role of PRR in visually guided movement tasks and to obtain evidence that PRR signals are used to drive arm movements, we tested the hypothesis that increased neuronal activity during a preparatory delay period would lead to faster reach reaction times but would not be correlated with saccade reaction times. This proved to be the case only when the type of movement and not the spatial goal of that movement was known in advance. The correlation was strongest in cells that showed significantly more activity on arm reach compared with saccade trials. No significant correlations were found during delay periods in which spatial information was provided in advance. These data support the idea that PRR constitutes a bottleneck in the processing of spatial information for an upcoming arm reach. The lack of a correlation with saccadic reaction time also supports the idea that PRR processing is effector specific, that is, it is involved in specifying targets for arm movements but not targets for eye movements.
为了获取我们所看到的东西,视觉空间信息最终必须导致激活相应的一组肌肉。这种从感觉到运动的转换需要在编码目标位置的信息和编码将移动哪个效应器的信息之间进行交互。猴子顶叶够物区域(PRR)的活动既反映空间信息,也反映在即将到来的够物或扫视任务中将要使用的效应器(手臂或眼睛)。为了进一步阐明PRR在视觉引导运动任务中的功能作用,并获得PRR信号用于驱动手臂运动的证据,我们测试了这样一个假设:在准备延迟期增加的神经元活动会导致更快的够物反应时间,但与扫视反应时间无关。结果证明,只有当预先知道运动的类型而不是该运动的空间目标时,情况才是如此。在与扫视试验相比,在手臂够物时显示出明显更多活动的细胞中,这种相关性最强。在预先提供空间信息的延迟期内未发现显著相关性。这些数据支持这样一种观点,即PRR构成了即将到来的手臂够物空间信息处理中的一个瓶颈。与扫视反应时间缺乏相关性也支持这样一种观点,即PRR处理是效应器特异性的,也就是说,它参与指定手臂运动的目标,而不是眼睛运动的目标。