Suppr超能文献

评估各种饮食模式与不同食物生产系统相结合对环境的影响。

Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems.

作者信息

Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M

机构信息

Department of Neurorehabilitation, Villa Salus Hospital, Mestre-Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;61(2):279-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies support the hypothesis that plant-based diets are environmentally better than meat-based diets. This study aims to further explore this topic and to compare different environmental impacts resulting from different dietary patterns (omnivorous, vegetarian, vegan) and methods of production (conventional farming and organic agriculture).

DESIGN

Three weekly balanced diets, equivalent to one another for energetic and nutrient content, have been planned: an omnivorous one, a vegetarian one and a vegan one. For each one, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method has been applied in order to calculate the environmental impact, expressed in 'points'.

INTERVENTIONS

The software we selected to carry out the Inventory Analysis and the Impact Assessment is SimaPro5. The Assessment phase has been conducted using Ecoindicator 99, a damage-oriented method, which analyses the impact according to three large damage categories, each of them subsuming various impact categories.

摘要

目的

近期研究支持这样一种假说,即植物性饮食在环境方面优于肉类饮食。本研究旨在进一步探讨这一话题,并比较不同饮食模式(杂食、素食、纯素食)和生产方式(传统农业和有机农业)所产生的不同环境影响。

设计

已规划了三种每周均衡饮食,它们在能量和营养成分上彼此相当:一种杂食饮食、一种素食饮食和一种纯素食饮食。对于每种饮食,均采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来计算以“点数”表示的环境影响。

干预措施

我们选择用于进行清单分析和影响评估的软件是SimaPro5。评估阶段使用了Ecoindicator 99,这是一种面向损害的方法,它根据三大类损害来分析影响,每大类又包含各种影响类别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验