Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M
Department of Neurorehabilitation, Villa Salus Hospital, Mestre-Venice, Italy.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;61(2):279-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
Recent studies support the hypothesis that plant-based diets are environmentally better than meat-based diets. This study aims to further explore this topic and to compare different environmental impacts resulting from different dietary patterns (omnivorous, vegetarian, vegan) and methods of production (conventional farming and organic agriculture).
Three weekly balanced diets, equivalent to one another for energetic and nutrient content, have been planned: an omnivorous one, a vegetarian one and a vegan one. For each one, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method has been applied in order to calculate the environmental impact, expressed in 'points'.
The software we selected to carry out the Inventory Analysis and the Impact Assessment is SimaPro5. The Assessment phase has been conducted using Ecoindicator 99, a damage-oriented method, which analyses the impact according to three large damage categories, each of them subsuming various impact categories.
近期研究支持这样一种假说,即植物性饮食在环境方面优于肉类饮食。本研究旨在进一步探讨这一话题,并比较不同饮食模式(杂食、素食、纯素食)和生产方式(传统农业和有机农业)所产生的不同环境影响。
已规划了三种每周均衡饮食,它们在能量和营养成分上彼此相当:一种杂食饮食、一种素食饮食和一种纯素食饮食。对于每种饮食,均采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来计算以“点数”表示的环境影响。
我们选择用于进行清单分析和影响评估的软件是SimaPro5。评估阶段使用了Ecoindicator 99,这是一种面向损害的方法,它根据三大类损害来分析影响,每大类又包含各种影响类别。