Miettunen Jouko, Veijola Juha, Lauronen Erika, Kantojärvi Liisa, Joukamaa Matti
Department of Psychiatry, Oulu University and Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.10.007. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
There have been many comparisons between men and women on psychological characteristics and personality. The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and Temperament and Character Inventory developed by Cloninger are used to measure the following temperament dimensions: novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, and persistence. Studies using these scales in healthy (nonclinical) populations have reported varying results on sex differences, but there is no meta-analysis of the topic. In this study, meta-analytic methods were used to estimate sex differences in these temperament dimensions and to study the effect of mean age of the sample and location of the study (Asia/other) on possible differences. Studies on healthy populations were systematically collected; the required minimum sample size was 100. The search resulted in 32 eligible studies. Consequently, women scored higher in reward dependence (pooled effect size; Cohen's d = -0.63; z test, P value < .001) and harm avoidance (d = -0.33; P < .001). There were no differences in novelty seeking (d = -0.04; P = .29) or in persistence (d = -0.02; P = .62). The sex difference in reward dependence was significantly smaller in Asian studies. This study was the first one to pool studies on sex differences in Cloninger's temperament dimensions. Women scored consistently higher in harm avoidance in the studies included. Together with similar sex difference found in related traits (eg, depression), this finding supports the validity of this temperament dimension. The given data on sex differences should be taken into account in future studies using these instruments.
关于男性和女性的心理特征及性格,已经有过很多比较。克隆宁格编制的三维人格问卷和气质与性格量表被用于测量以下气质维度:寻求新奇、避免伤害、奖赏依赖和坚持性。在健康(非临床)人群中使用这些量表的研究报告了关于性别差异的不同结果,但尚无该主题的荟萃分析。在本研究中,采用荟萃分析方法来估计这些气质维度中的性别差异,并研究样本平均年龄和研究地点(亚洲/其他地区)对可能存在的差异的影响。系统收集了关于健康人群的研究;所需的最小样本量为100。检索结果得到32项符合条件的研究。结果显示,女性在奖赏依赖方面得分更高(合并效应量;科恩d值 = -0.63;z检验,P值 < .001),在避免伤害方面也更高(d = -0.33;P < .001)。在寻求新奇方面(d = -0.04;P = .29)或坚持性方面(d = -0.02;P = .62)没有差异。在亚洲的研究中,奖赏依赖方面的性别差异显著更小。本研究是第一项汇总关于克隆宁格气质维度性别差异研究的。在所纳入的研究中,女性在避免伤害方面始终得分更高。连同在相关特质(如抑郁)中发现的类似性别差异,这一发现支持了该气质维度的有效性。在未来使用这些工具的研究中,应考虑所给出的关于性别差异的数据。