Suppr超能文献

使用IOLMaster、扫描周边前房深度分析仪和眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量前房深度的比较。

Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

作者信息

Lavanya Raghavan, Teo Livia, Friedman David S, Aung Han T, Baskaran Mani, Gao Hong, Alfred Tamuno, Seah Steve K, Kashiwagi Kenji, Foster Paul J, Aung Tin

机构信息

Glaucoma Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;91(8):1023-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113761. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

Abstract

AIM

To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by three non-contact devices-the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) METHODS: Prospective, cross sectional study of 497 phakic subjects over 50 years of age attending a community clinic in Singapore. Anterior chamber depth of the right eye was measured using all three techniques by the same investigator. Depth measurements were made from the corneal epithelium to the anterior lens surface. The values obtained were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

232 men and 265 women were examined (mean (SD) age, 63.4 (7.9) years). Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.08 (0.36) mm with IOLMaster, 3.10 (0.44) mm with SPAC, and 3.14 (0.34) mm with AS-OCT. A significant difference was present between the anterior chamber depth measurements recorded by the three devices (p<0.0001). Mean differences between the measurements were: AS-OCT v IOLMaster, 0.062 (0.007) mm (95% limits of agreement, -0.37 to 0.25 mm) (p<0.0001); AS-OCT v SPAC, 0.035 (0.011) mm (-0.44 to 0.51 mm) (p = 0.0001); SPAC v IOLMaster, 0.027 (0.012) mm (-0.57 to 0.50 mm) (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

AS-OCT gave systematically deeper anterior chamber measurements than SPAC and IOL-Master. However, as the differences found were small they are unlikely to be clinically important.

摘要

目的

比较三种非接触式设备(IOLMaster、扫描周边前房深度分析仪(SPAC)和Visante眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT))测量前房深度的情况。方法:对新加坡一家社区诊所的497名年龄超过50岁的有晶状体受试者进行前瞻性横断面研究。由同一名研究者使用这三种技术测量右眼的前房深度。深度测量是从角膜上皮到晶状体前表面。使用Bland-Altman分析比较获得的值。

结果

检查了232名男性和265名女性(平均(标准差)年龄,63.4(7.9)岁)。IOLMaster测量的平均前房深度为3.08(0.36)mm,SPAC为3.10(0.44)mm,AS-OCT为3.14(0.34)mm。三种设备记录的前房深度测量值之间存在显著差异(p<0.0001)。测量值之间的平均差异为:AS-OCT与IOLMaster相比,0.062(0.007)mm(95%一致性界限,-0.37至0.25 mm)(p<0.0001);AS-OCT与SPAC相比,0.035(0.011)mm(-0.44至0.51 mm)(p = 0.0001);SPAC与IOLMaster相比,0.027(0.012)mm(-0.57至0.50 mm)(p = 0.027)。

结论

AS-OCT系统测量的前房深度比SPAC和IOLMaster更深。然而,由于发现的差异较小,它们在临床上不太可能具有重要意义。

相似文献

5
Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.LS 900 非接触式生物测量仪的评估。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;94(1):106-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

6
Comparison of anterior segment and lens biometric measurements in patients with cataract.白内障患者前节和晶状体生物测量的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;258(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04482-0. Epub 2019 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

10
Ocular parameters in the subgroups of angle closure glaucoma.闭角型青光眼亚组中的眼部参数。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;28(4):253-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00324.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验