Suppr超能文献

使用IOLMaster、扫描周边前房深度分析仪和眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量前房深度的比较。

Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

作者信息

Lavanya Raghavan, Teo Livia, Friedman David S, Aung Han T, Baskaran Mani, Gao Hong, Alfred Tamuno, Seah Steve K, Kashiwagi Kenji, Foster Paul J, Aung Tin

机构信息

Glaucoma Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;91(8):1023-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113761. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

Abstract

AIM

To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by three non-contact devices-the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) METHODS: Prospective, cross sectional study of 497 phakic subjects over 50 years of age attending a community clinic in Singapore. Anterior chamber depth of the right eye was measured using all three techniques by the same investigator. Depth measurements were made from the corneal epithelium to the anterior lens surface. The values obtained were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

232 men and 265 women were examined (mean (SD) age, 63.4 (7.9) years). Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.08 (0.36) mm with IOLMaster, 3.10 (0.44) mm with SPAC, and 3.14 (0.34) mm with AS-OCT. A significant difference was present between the anterior chamber depth measurements recorded by the three devices (p<0.0001). Mean differences between the measurements were: AS-OCT v IOLMaster, 0.062 (0.007) mm (95% limits of agreement, -0.37 to 0.25 mm) (p<0.0001); AS-OCT v SPAC, 0.035 (0.011) mm (-0.44 to 0.51 mm) (p = 0.0001); SPAC v IOLMaster, 0.027 (0.012) mm (-0.57 to 0.50 mm) (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

AS-OCT gave systematically deeper anterior chamber measurements than SPAC and IOL-Master. However, as the differences found were small they are unlikely to be clinically important.

摘要

目的

比较三种非接触式设备(IOLMaster、扫描周边前房深度分析仪(SPAC)和Visante眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT))测量前房深度的情况。方法:对新加坡一家社区诊所的497名年龄超过50岁的有晶状体受试者进行前瞻性横断面研究。由同一名研究者使用这三种技术测量右眼的前房深度。深度测量是从角膜上皮到晶状体前表面。使用Bland-Altman分析比较获得的值。

结果

检查了232名男性和265名女性(平均(标准差)年龄,63.4(7.9)岁)。IOLMaster测量的平均前房深度为3.08(0.36)mm,SPAC为3.10(0.44)mm,AS-OCT为3.14(0.34)mm。三种设备记录的前房深度测量值之间存在显著差异(p<0.0001)。测量值之间的平均差异为:AS-OCT与IOLMaster相比,0.062(0.007)mm(95%一致性界限,-0.37至0.25 mm)(p<0.0001);AS-OCT与SPAC相比,0.035(0.011)mm(-0.44至0.51 mm)(p = 0.0001);SPAC与IOLMaster相比,0.027(0.012)mm(-0.57至0.50 mm)(p = 0.027)。

结论

AS-OCT系统测量的前房深度比SPAC和IOLMaster更深。然而,由于发现的差异较小,它们在临床上不太可能具有重要意义。

相似文献

2
Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography.
Ophthalmology. 2005 Feb;112(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.09.019.
5
Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;94(1):106-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
7
Anterior segment parameters measured with 2 optical devices compared to ultrasonic data.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):177-82. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000214.
8
Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.031. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
9
Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLmaster versus the Pentacam.
J Refract Surg. 2007 Apr;23(4):368-73. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070401-09.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):29-43. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Smartphone-Acquired Anterior Segment Images for Deep Learning Prediction of Anterior Chamber Depth: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 23;9:912214. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.912214. eCollection 2022.
5
Optical Coherence Tomography Reveals Sigmoidal Crystalline Lens Changes during Accommodation.
Vision (Basel). 2018 Aug 21;2(3):33. doi: 10.3390/vision2030033.
6
Comparison of anterior segment and lens biometric measurements in patients with cataract.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;258(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04482-0. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
7
A Novel Method of Quantitative Anterior Chamber Depth Estimation Using Temporal Perpendicular Digital Photography.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 29;5(4):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.4.10. eCollection 2016 Jul.
8
Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 18;9(7):1057-65. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes.
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.073. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
3
Finding cases of angle-closure glaucoma in clinic setting using a newly developed instrument.
Eye (Lond). 2006 Mar;20(3):319-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701869.
4
Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1843-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.024.
7
A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;86(4):458-62. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.458.
8
Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry : intraobserver and interobserver reliability.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01214-7.
9
Real-time optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment at 1310 nm.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug;119(8):1179-85. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.8.1179.
10
Ocular parameters in the subgroups of angle closure glaucoma.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;28(4):253-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00324.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验