• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用两种光学设备测量的眼前节参数与超声数据的比较。

Anterior segment parameters measured with 2 optical devices compared to ultrasonic data.

作者信息

Nemeth Gabor, Hassan Ziad, Szalai Eszter, Berta Andras, Modis Laszlo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):177-82. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000214.

DOI:10.5301/ejo.5000214
PMID:23225092
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ophthalmic parameters can be measured with different techniques and devices. Our aim was to measure anterior segment parameters using 2 optical devices and to compare the data to ultrasonic technique.

METHODS

Axial length (AL) was measured with IOLMaster; anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined using IOLMaster, Visante® optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Pentacam® HR; and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured with Pentacam® HR and with ultrasound.

RESULTS

In 45 eyes of 45 patients (age 62.73±15.31), the AL was 23.35±1.49 mm. The CCT was 541.7±39.9 µm with Visante OCT, 549.7±39.2 µm with Pentacam® HR, and 534.3±41.3 µm with ultrasonic device. The ACD was 3.0±0.42 mm with IOLMaster, 3.26±0.95 mm with Visante OCT, and 3.06±0.41 mm with Pentacam® HR. In case of CCT measurements, data obtained with Pentacam HR correlated with the results of ultrasonic measurements (r=0.89; p<0.001) and Visante OCT measurements (r=0.88; p<0.001). Regarding ACD results, a significant correlation was observed between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster (r=0.95; p<0.0001) but they did not significantly correlate to Visante OCT data (r=0.23; p=0.12). Correlation was significant between AL and ACD measured with IOLMaster (r=0.67; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CCT and ACD data show strong correlation between different devices.

摘要

目的

眼科参数可通过不同技术和设备进行测量。我们的目的是使用两种光学设备测量眼前节参数,并将数据与超声技术进行比较。

方法

使用IOLMaster测量眼轴长度(AL);使用IOLMaster、Visante®光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和Pentacam® HR测定前房深度(ACD);使用Pentacam® HR和超声测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)。

结果

在45例患者(年龄62.73±15.31岁)的45只眼中,AL为23.35±1.49 mm。使用Visante OCT测量的CCT为541.7±39.9 µm,使用Pentacam® HR测量的为549.7±39.2 µm,使用超声设备测量的为534.3±41.3 µm。使用IOLMaster测量的ACD为3.0±0.42 mm,使用Visante OCT测量的为3.26±0.95 mm,使用Pentacam® HR测量的为3.06±0.41 mm。在CCT测量中,Pentacam HR获得的数据与超声测量结果(r=0.89;p<0.001)和Visante OCT测量结果(r=0.88;p<0.001)相关。关于ACD结果,Pentacam HR与IOLMaster之间观察到显著相关性(r=0.95;p<0.0001),但它们与Visante OCT数据无显著相关性(r=0.23;p=0.12)。IOLMaster测量的AL与ACD之间相关性显著(r=0.67;p<0.001)。

结论

CCT和ACD数据显示不同设备之间有很强的相关性。

相似文献

1
Anterior segment parameters measured with 2 optical devices compared to ultrasonic data.使用两种光学设备测量的眼前节参数与超声数据的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):177-82. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000214.
2
Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT.比较 LenStar LS900、Pentacam 和 Visante AS-OCT 测量的中央角膜厚度和前房深度。
Cornea. 2012 Sep;31(9):983-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8e2f.
3
Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.基于Scheimpflug技术和扫频光学生物测量的重复性及一致性
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Oct;40(5):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements conducted with Pentacam HR® and IOLMaster®.使用Pentacam HR®和IOLMaster®进行前房深度测量的比较。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;42(2):144-7. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110210-03. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
5
Comparison of Anterior Segment Biometric Measurements between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster in Normal and High Myopic Eyes.Pentacam HR与IOLMaster在前房生物测量参数上在正视眼和高度近视眼之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 17;10(11):e0143110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143110. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparison of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements Using 4 Different Devices.使用4种不同设备对角膜直径和前房深度测量结果的比较
Cornea. 2016 Jun;35(6):838-42. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000840.
7
Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪与 Scheimpflug 部分相干干涉仪的一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Apr 1;47(4):488-495. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000483.
8
Determinants of anterior chamber depth in a large Caucasian population and agreement between intra-ocular lens Master and Pentacam measurements of this variable.一大群白种人前房深度的决定因素以及眼内透镜Master与Pentacam对该变量测量结果之间的一致性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;94(2):e150-5. doi: 10.1111/aos.12824. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.在新型光学相干断层扫描仪中实现的光生物测量的可重复性和再现性,并与光学低相干反射计进行比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Nov;45(11):1619-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.002.
10
Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描与Visante光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的对比研究
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):796-801.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of corneal measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Pentacam HR topographer.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)和 Pentacam HR 地形图比较正常眼和圆锥角膜眼中的角膜测量值。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 May 3;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02946-w.
2
Comparative study of anterior segment measurements using 3 different instruments in myopic patients after ICL implantation.近视患者 ICL 植入术后使用 3 种不同仪器测量前节的对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1194-y.
3
Comparison between a New Optical Biometry Device and an Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographer for Measuring Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth.
一种新型光学生物测量仪与眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪在测量中央角膜厚度和前房深度方面的比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:6347236. doi: 10.1155/2016/6347236. Epub 2016 Jun 14.