• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Complexity in language learning and treatment.语言学习与治疗中的复杂性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):3-5. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/002).
2
Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits.句法缺陷治疗中的复杂性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):30-42. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/005).
3
Cross-linguistic transfer effects after phonologically based cognate therapy in a case of multilingual specific language impairment (SLI).多语儿童特定语言障碍(SLI)病例中基于语音的同源词疗法后的跨语言迁移效应。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 May;52(3):270-284. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12270. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
4
The Italian Adaptation of the Treatment of Underlying Forms for Object Relatives in Agrammatic Aphasia: Training Efficacy, Generalization Patterns, and Cross-Linguistic Implications.意大利语版《语法缺失性失语症中宾语关系从句底层形式的治疗:训练效果、泛化模式及跨语言影响》
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 May 8;68(5):2399-2422. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00305. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
5
How justice can affect jury: training abstract words promotes generalisation to concrete words in patients with aphasia.正义如何影响陪审团:训练抽象词可促进失语症患者对具体词的泛化。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):738-69. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.899504. Epub 2014 May 8.
6
Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits.命名障碍治疗中的复杂性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):18-29. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/004).
7
Rehabilitation in bilingual aphasia: evidence for within- and between-language generalization.双语失语症的康复:语言内和语言间泛化的证据。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 May;22(2):S298-309. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0085).
8
Word structures of Granada Spanish-speaking preschoolers with typical versus protracted phonological development.具有典型与延迟语音发展的格拉纳达西班牙语学前儿童的单词结构
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 May-Jun;50(3):298-311. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12133. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Using the miniature linguistic system in teaching syntax: two case studies.在句法教学中运用微型语言系统:两个案例研究
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 Aug;50(3):247-53. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5003.247.
10
Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms.在语言框架内治疗agrammatic失语症:底层形式的治疗。
Aphasiology. 2005 Nov;19(10-11):1021-1036. doi: 10.1080/02687030544000227.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending Complexity to Word-Final Position via Telepractice: Intervention Effects for English-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorder.通过远程治疗将复杂性扩展到单词末尾位置:对患有语音障碍的英语儿童的干预效果
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2025 Jan 9;56(1):42-57. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00020. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Are Late Talkers Just Late? Neighborhood Density and Word Frequency Properties of Late Talkers' Spoken Vocabularies.晚说话者只是晚说话吗?晚说话者口语词汇的邻里密度和词频特征。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Oct 8;67(10):3794-3802. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00769. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia.脑卒中后失语症的靶向神经康复策略。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2023;41(3-4):129-191. doi: 10.3233/RNN-231344.
4
Word-final complexity in speech sound intervention: two case studies.言语声音干预中的词尾复杂度:两个案例研究。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Jun 3;37(4-6):363-384. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2122082. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
Neurocognitive Recovery of Sentence Processing in Aphasia.失语症句子加工的神经认知恢复。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 22;62(11):3947-3972. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0219.
6
A close call: Interference from semantic neighbourhood density and similarity in language production.千钧一发:语言产出中语义邻域密度和相似性的干扰
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):145-168. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0856-y.
7
Changes in task-based effective connectivity in language networks following rehabilitation in post-stroke patients with aphasia.失语症脑卒中患者康复后语言网络中基于任务的有效连接性变化。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;9:316. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00316. eCollection 2015.
8
Grammatical Planning Units During Real-Time Sentence Production in Speakers With Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers.语法性失语症患者和健康受试者实时句子生成过程中的语法规划单元
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug;58(4):1182-94. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0250.
9
How justice can affect jury: training abstract words promotes generalisation to concrete words in patients with aphasia.正义如何影响陪审团:训练抽象词可促进失语症患者对具体词的泛化。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):738-69. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.899504. Epub 2014 May 8.
10
Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays.词汇习得年龄对语音延迟儿童治疗的影响。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2012 Jan 1;33(1):121-144. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000294.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity.失语症和言语失用症中语音错误的治疗:语音复杂性的影响。
Aphasiology. 2002 Jan 1;16(4-6):609-622. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000266. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
2
Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits.句法缺陷治疗中的复杂性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):30-42. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/005).
3
Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits.命名障碍治疗中的复杂性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):18-29. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/004).
4
Phonological complexity and language learnability.语音复杂性与语言可学性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):6-17. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/003).
5
Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science.失语症的单受试者对照实验:科学现状与科学进展
J Commun Disord. 2006 Jul-Aug;39(4):266-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
6
The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality.语义复杂性在命名缺陷治疗中的作用:通过控制范例典型性对流利性失语症患者进行语义类别训练。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Jun;46(3):608-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/048).
7
The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE).句法复杂性在语法缺失性失语症句子缺陷治疗中的作用:治疗效果的复杂性解释(CATE)。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Jun;46(3):591-607. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/047).
8
Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?在缺乏明确负面证据的情况下的语言习得:从小处着手有多重要?
Cognition. 1999 Aug 25;72(1):67-109. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00031-1.
9
Relearning after damage in connectionist networks: toward a theory of rehabilitation.联结主义网络受损后的重新学习:迈向一种康复理论。
Brain Lang. 1996 Jan;52(1):25-82. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0004.

语言学习与治疗中的复杂性。

Complexity in language learning and treatment.

作者信息

Thompson Cynthia K

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-3540, USA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):3-5. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/002).

DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/002)
PMID:17329670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3079414/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To introduce a Clinical Forum focused on the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (C. K. Thompson, L. P. Shapiro, S. Kiran, & J. Sobecks, 2003), a counterintuitive but effective approach for treating language disorders. This approach espouses training complex structures to promote generalized improvement of simpler, linguistically related structures. Three articles are included, addressing complexity in treatment of phonology, lexical-semantics, and syntax.

METHOD

Complexity hierarchies based on models of normal language representation and processing are discussed in each language domain. In addition, each article presents single-subject controlled experimental studies examining the complexity effect. By counterbalancing treatment of complex and simple structures across participants, acquisition and generalization patterns are examined as they emerge.

RESULTS

In all language domains, cascading generalization occurs from more to less complex structures; however, the opposite pattern is rarely seen. The results are robust, with replication within and across participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The construct of complexity appears to be a general principle that is relevant to treating a range of language disorders in both children and adults. While challenging the long-standing clinical notion that treatment should begin with simple structures, mounting evidence points toward the facilitative effects of using more complex structures as a starting point for treatment.

摘要

目的

介绍一个临床论坛,该论坛聚焦于治疗效果的复杂性理论(C.K.汤普森、L.P.夏皮罗、S.基兰和J.索贝克,2003年),这是一种治疗语言障碍的反直觉但有效的方法。这种方法主张训练复杂结构,以促进更简单的、语言相关结构的普遍改善。包含三篇文章,分别探讨语音学、词汇语义学和句法治疗中的复杂性。

方法

在每个语言领域中讨论基于正常语言表征和处理模型的复杂性层次结构。此外,每篇文章都呈现了单受试者对照实验研究,以检验复杂性效应。通过在参与者之间平衡复杂结构和简单结构的治疗,研究习得和泛化模式的出现情况。

结果

在所有语言领域中,从更复杂到较不复杂的结构会出现级联泛化;然而,相反的模式很少见。结果很稳健,在参与者内部和参与者之间都有重复。

结论

复杂性这一概念似乎是一个普遍原则,与治疗儿童和成人的一系列语言障碍相关。虽然这挑战了治疗应从简单结构开始这一长期存在的临床观念,但越来越多的证据表明,以更复杂的结构作为治疗起点具有促进作用。