Carneiro Paula, Fernandez Angel, Dias Ana Rita
Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):115-29. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.115.
In the present study, we used the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm to analyze the relationship between theme identifiability of word lists and false memories in adults and children. We conducted two normative studies to determine the identifiability levels for critical unpresented words in 40 associative lists in adults and in 16 associative lists in children. Then, in three experiments, false memories for critical words that were either easy or hard to identify were analyzed in adults and in children 4-5 years old and 11-12 years old. Opposite results were found for adults and children. Lists with highly identifiable critical words produced fewer false memories for adults but more false memories for children. These results suggest that, if they can identify critical words, adults use an identify-to-reject strategy to edit out false memories, whereas, in children, theme identification does not lead to the use of such a monitoring strategy.
在本研究中,我们使用迪斯/罗迪格 - 麦克德莫特范式来分析成人和儿童单词列表的主题可识别性与错误记忆之间的关系。我们进行了两项规范性研究,以确定成人40个联想列表中关键未呈现单词的可识别水平,以及儿童16个联想列表中关键未呈现单词的可识别水平。然后,在三个实验中,分析了成人以及4至5岁和11至12岁儿童对易于识别或难以识别的关键单词的错误记忆。在成人和儿童中发现了相反的结果。对于成人来说,关键单词具有高度可识别性的列表产生的错误记忆较少,但对于儿童来说,产生的错误记忆较多。这些结果表明,如果成人能够识别关键单词,他们会使用识别 - 拒绝策略来排除错误记忆,而对于儿童来说,主题识别并不会导致使用这样的监控策略。