• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式决策能否改善高血压自我护理行为及结果?

Does participatory decision making improve hypertension self-care behaviors and outcomes?

作者信息

Cho Alex H, Voils Corrine I, Yancy William S, Oddone Eugene Z, Bosworth Hayden B

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Vetterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 May;9(5):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06489.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06489.x
PMID:17485968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110143/
Abstract

This study examined patients' perceptions of their providers' participatory decision making (PDM) style and hypertension self-care behaviors and outcomes. Five hundred fifty-four veterans with hypertension enrolled in the Veterans' Study to Improve the Control of Hypertension rated providers' PDM styles using a validated 3-item instrument. Behaviors assessed included presence of a home blood pressure monitor, monitoring frequency, and self-reported antihypertensive medication adherence. Overall, veterans with hypertension rated providers as highly participatory. In adjusted analyses, a lower PDM score was associated with decreased odds of having a home monitor (odds ratio, 0.90 per 10-point decrement in PDM score; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.98) but not with monitoring frequency, adherence, or blood pressure control. Providers' involvement of patients in decision making, reflected in ratings of PDM style, may be important to securing patients' participation in their own care, but alone this factor seems insufficient. No relationship between PDM score and blood pressure control was observed.

摘要

本研究考察了患者对其医疗服务提供者参与式决策(PDM)风格以及高血压自我护理行为和结果的看法。554名患有高血压的退伍军人参与了“改善高血压控制退伍军人研究”,他们使用经过验证的3项工具对医疗服务提供者的PDM风格进行评分。评估的行为包括是否拥有家用血压监测仪、监测频率以及自我报告的抗高血压药物依从性。总体而言,患有高血压的退伍军人将医疗服务提供者评为高度参与式。在调整分析中,较低的PDM评分与拥有家用监测仪的几率降低相关(PDM评分每降低10分,比值比为0.90;95%置信区间为0.83 - 0.98),但与监测频率、依从性或血压控制无关。医疗服务提供者让患者参与决策,这在PDM风格评分中有所体现,对于确保患者参与自身护理可能很重要,但仅这一因素似乎并不充分。未观察到PDM评分与血压控制之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Does participatory decision making improve hypertension self-care behaviors and outcomes?参与式决策能否改善高血压自我护理行为及结果?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 May;9(5):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06489.x.
2
The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management.医生沟通、参与式决策以及患者理解在糖尿病自我管理中的相对重要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):243-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.x.
3
Physicians' participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study.医生的参与式决策与糖尿病护理过程及结果的质量:三联研究结果
Chronic Illn. 2009 Sep;5(3):165-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309339258. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
4
Factors associated with non-adherence to three hypertension self-management behaviors: preliminary data for a new instrument.与三种高血压自我管理行为不依从相关的因素:新工具的初步数据。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2195-1. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Home blood pressure monitoring as an intervention to control hypertension: comment on "Home blood pressure management and improved blood pressure control".家庭血压监测作为控制高血压的一种干预措施:对《家庭血压管理与血压控制改善》的评论
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1181-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.292.
6
The impact of health literacy on desire for participation in healthcare, medical visit communication, and patient reported outcomes among patients with hypertension.健康素养对高血压患者参与医疗保健的意愿、医疗就诊沟通和患者报告结局的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1469-76. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2466-5. Epub 2013 May 21.
7
Implementation of shared decision making by physician training to optimise hypertension treatment. Study protocol of a cluster-RCT.通过医生培训实施共享决策以优化高血压治疗。一项集群 RCT 的研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 11;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-73.
8
Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication.改善糖尿病患者的高血压控制:协作性和主动性健康沟通的效果
Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1361-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
9
Ethnic differences in parents' perception of participatory decision-making style of their children's physicians.父母对子女医生参与式决策风格认知的种族差异。
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4):328-35. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000118707.99818.cc.
10
The Take Control of Your Blood pressure (TCYB) study: study design and methodology.控制你的血压(TCYB)研究:研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jan;28(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of doctor-patient communication on medication adherence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review.医患沟通对高血压患者药物依从性和血压控制的影响:一项系统综述
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 28;12:e18527. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18527. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometrics of the computer-based Relationships with Health Care Provider Scale in older adults.老年人基于计算机的与医疗服务提供者关系量表的心理测量学
J Nurs Meas. 2011;19(1):3-16. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.19.1.3.
3
A 41-year-old African American man with poorly controlled hypertension: review of patient and physician factors related to hypertension treatment adherence.一名41岁的非裔美国男性,患有控制不佳的高血压:回顾与高血压治疗依从性相关的患者和医生因素。
JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1260-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.358. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
4
Patient and social environment factors associated with self blood pressure monitoring by male veterans with hypertension.与高血压男性退伍军人自我血压监测相关的患者及社会环境因素
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Sep;10(9):692-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.00005.x.
5
Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors.血压控制中的种族差异:潜在的解释因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):692-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0547-7. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.并非所有患者都希望参与决策制定。一项关于公众偏好的全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
2
The veterans' study to improve the control of hypertension (V-STITCH): design and methodology.退伍军人高血压控制改善研究(V-STITCH):设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr;26(2):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.006.
3
Nurse administered telephone intervention for blood pressure control: a patient-tailored multifactorial intervention.护士实施的血压控制电话干预:一种针对患者的多因素干预措施。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Apr;57(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.03.011.
4
Racial differences in analgesic/anti-inflammatory medication adherence among patients with osteoarthritis.骨关节炎患者在止痛/抗炎药物依从性方面的种族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2005 Winter;15(1):116-22.
5
Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection.在感染HIV的患者中,更好的医患关系与更高的抗逆转录病毒治疗报告依从性相关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1096-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30418.x.
6
The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: a rising tide.1999年至2000年美国成人高血压负担:呈上升趋势。
Hypertension. 2004 Oct;44(4):398-404. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000142248.54761.56. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
7
Determinants of JNC VI guideline adherence, intensity of drug therapy, and blood pressure control by race and ethnicity.按种族和族裔划分的JNC VI指南依从性、药物治疗强度及血压控制的决定因素。
Hypertension. 2004 Oct;44(4):429-34. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000141439.34834.84. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
8
Medication adherence: a key factor in achieving blood pressure control and good clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.药物依从性:高血压患者实现血压控制和良好临床结局的关键因素。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004 Jul;19(4):357-62. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000126978.03828.9e.
9
Response formats and satisfaction surveys for elders.针对老年人的回应格式及满意度调查。
Gerontologist. 2004 Jun;44(3):358-67. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.3.358.
10
Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials.通过家庭监测控制血压:随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38121.684410.AE. Epub 2004 Jun 11.