Battmer Rolf-Dieter, O'Donoghue Gerard M, Lenarz Thomas
Department of Otolaryngology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):95S-99S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180315502.
To evaluate the failure rate of cochlear implant systems across a range of European implant centers.
Retrospective review.
Tertiary care cochlear implant centers in Europe.
A postal questionnaire was designed to assess the incidence and mode of total device failure and was sent to 34 European clinics.
Twenty seven (79%) centers replied providing data on 12,856 devices of which 488 (3.79%) had undergone total device failure. Of 8,581 Nucleus devices (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia), 169 had failed; of 1,761 Advanced Bionics systems (Advanced Bionics, Sylmar, USA), 123 had failed; of 1987 Med El devices (Med-El, Innsbruck, Austria), 179 had failed; and of 527 MXM devices (Laboratoires MXM, Vallauris, France), 17 had failed. Six (22%) centers never reported failures to competent authorities.
The study suggests that the overall reliability of cochlear implant systems is satisfactory but that reliability varies considerably between individual systems. There is a compelling need for agreed international definitions of failure and for the adoption of uniform reporting protocols. A common database, independent of the industry, would offer greater transparency to users and clinics.
评估一系列欧洲植入中心的人工耳蜗系统故障率。
回顾性研究。
欧洲的三级医疗人工耳蜗植入中心。
设计了一份邮政调查问卷,以评估整个设备故障的发生率和模式,并发送给34家欧洲诊所。
27家(79%)中心回复,提供了12,856台设备的数据,其中488台(3.79%)发生了整个设备故障。在8,581台Nucleus设备(澳大利亚悉尼科利耳公司)中,169台出现故障;在1,761套先进仿生学系统(美国西尔玛先进仿生学公司)中,123台出现故障;在1,987台美迪乐设备(奥地利因斯布鲁克美迪乐公司)中,179台出现故障;在527台MXM设备(法国瓦洛里斯MXM实验室)中,17台出现故障。6家(22%)中心从未向主管部门报告过故障。
该研究表明,人工耳蜗系统的总体可靠性令人满意,但各系统之间的可靠性差异很大。迫切需要就故障的国际定义达成一致,并采用统一的报告方案。一个独立于行业的通用数据库将为用户和诊所提供更高的透明度。