A standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: pro and con.
作者信息
Wendler David, Glantz Leonard
机构信息
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
出版信息
J Pediatr. 2007 Jun;150(6):579-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.018.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: pro and con.评估儿科研究风险的一项标准：赞成与反对
J Pediatr. 2007 Jun;150(6):579-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.018.
2
Minimal risk, yet again.
J Pediatr. 2007 Jun;150(6):570-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.040.
3
Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: toward a better standard for "minimal" risks.保护无法给予知情同意的受试者：迈向“最小”风险的更好标准。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;35(5):37-43.
4
In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children.为所有儿童的单一研究风险标准辩护。
J Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):565-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.08.051.
5
Young people as participants in exercise physiology research: practical issues.年轻人作为运动生理学研究的参与者：实际问题
J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):881. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000140491.
6
What is a "minor" increase over minimal risk?相较于最低风险而言，“轻微”增加是指什么？
J Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.07.013.
7
[Informed consent for standard procedures and for clinical research in paediatric anaesthesia].[小儿麻醉标准程序及临床研究的知情同意书]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 Jan;32(1):e61-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.10.022. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
8
Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice.儿科医疗中的知情同意、家长许可与患儿同意
Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):981-2.
9
Research examines the minimal risk standard for pediatric research.研究探讨了儿科研究的最低风险标准。
J Biolaw Bus. 2006;9(1):52-3.
引用本文的文献
1
"It Can Be Hard But It's Not Bad": Three Questions to Solicit Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Burdens to Participating in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.“这可能很难，但也没那么糟糕”：三个问题探究照料者对参与儿科姑息治疗研究的获益和负担的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;24(11):1641-1649. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0618. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
A Defense of The-Risks-of-Daily-Life.对《日常生活的风险》的辩护
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2017;27(3):413-442. doi: 10.1353/ken.2017.0033.
3
Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.青少年和家长对无临床获益的儿科研究的看法。
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):692-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0068. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
4
Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial.多中心 III 期临床试验中对重病儿童使用延期同意。
Trials. 2011 Mar 31;12:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-90.
5
What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.当我们担忧临床研究的伦理学问题时，我们所担心的是什么。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Jun;32(3):161-80. doi: 10.1007/s11017-011-9176-y.
6
Is it possible to protect pediatric research subjects without blocking appropriate research?是否有可能在不阻碍适当研究的情况下保护儿科研究受试者？
J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):467-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.027.
本文引用的文献
1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断：启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.量化联邦最低风险标准：对无直接受益前景的儿科研究的影响。
JAMA. 2005 Aug 17;294(7):826-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.826.
3
Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk.从最低风险的定义中剔除日常生活风险标准。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):35-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010470.
4
Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.作为研究中的一项国际伦理标准的最小风险。
J Med Philos. 2004 Jun;29(3):351-78. doi: 10.1080/03605310490500545.
5
Nontherapeutic research procedures involving children with cancer.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1994 Jul;11(3):134-6. doi: 10.1177/104345429401100310.
6
Proxy consent in the experimentation situation.实验情形下的代理同意。
Perspect Biol Med. 1974 Autumn;18(1):2-20.
7
Perception of risk.风险认知
Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280-5. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507.
8
Optimistic biases about personal risks.对个人风险的乐观偏差。
Science. 1989 Dec 8;246(4935):1232-3. doi: 10.1126/science.2686031.
9
Experimentation in children: sharing in sociality.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1976 Dec;6(6):41-6.
10
Children as research subjects: a reply.儿童作为研究对象：一则回应。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1977 Apr;7(2):40-2.
Zotero 插件