• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过接种疫苗来保护弱势群体。

Vaccinating to protect a vulnerable subpopulation.

作者信息

Dushoff Jonathan, Plotkin Joshua B, Viboud Cecile, Simonsen Lone, Miller Mark, Loeb Mark, Earn David J D

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2007 May;4(5):e174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040174.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040174
PMID:17518515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1872043/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidemic influenza causes serious mortality and morbidity in temperate countries each winter. Research suggests that schoolchildren are critical in the spread of influenza virus, while the elderly and the very young are most vulnerable to the disease. Under these conditions, it is unclear how best to focus prevention efforts in order to protect the population. Here we investigate the question of how to protect a population against a disease when one group is particularly effective at spreading disease and another group is more vulnerable to the effects of the disease.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We developed a simple mathematical model of an epidemic that includes assortative mixing between groups of hosts. We evaluate the impact of different vaccine allocation strategies across a wide range of parameter values. With this model we demonstrate that the optimal vaccination strategy is extremely sensitive to the assortativity of population mixing, as well as to the reproductive number of the disease in each group. Small differences in parameter values can change the best vaccination strategy from one focused on the most vulnerable individuals to one focused on the most transmissive individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limited amount of information about relevant parameters, we suggest that changes in vaccination strategy, while potentially promising, should be approached with caution. In particular, we find that, while switching vaccine to more active groups may protect vulnerable groups in many cases, switching too much vaccine, or switching vaccine under slightly different conditions, may lead to large increases in disease in the vulnerable group. This outcome is more likely when vaccine limitation is stringent, when mixing is highly structured, or when transmission levels are high.

摘要

背景

在温带国家,每年冬季流行性感冒都会导致严重的死亡率和发病率。研究表明,学童在流感病毒传播中起关键作用,而老年人和幼儿最易感染该疾病。在这种情况下,尚不清楚如何最有效地集中预防措施以保护人群。在此,我们研究当一组人群在传播疾病方面特别有效而另一组人群更易受疾病影响时,如何保护人群免受疾病侵害的问题。

方法与结果

我们建立了一个简单的流行病数学模型,该模型包括宿主群体之间的分类混合。我们在广泛的参数值范围内评估不同疫苗分配策略的影响。通过这个模型,我们证明最佳疫苗接种策略对人群混合的分类性以及每组疾病的繁殖数极为敏感。参数值的微小差异可能会使最佳疫苗接种策略从侧重于最易感染个体转变为侧重于最具传播性的个体。

结论

鉴于有关相关参数的信息有限,我们建议疫苗接种策略的改变虽可能有前景,但应谨慎对待。特别是,我们发现,虽然在许多情况下将疫苗转向更具传播性的群体可能会保护易感染群体,但过度转移疫苗或在略有不同的条件下转移疫苗,可能会导致易感染群体中的疾病大幅增加。当疫苗供应受限、混合结构高度结构化或传播水平较高时,这种结果更有可能出现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/c8edb3b0b80e/pmed.0040174.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/4ce510c3da4a/pmed.0040174.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/e10f1830faba/pmed.0040174.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/c8edb3b0b80e/pmed.0040174.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/4ce510c3da4a/pmed.0040174.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/e10f1830faba/pmed.0040174.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/1880846/c8edb3b0b80e/pmed.0040174.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Vaccinating to protect a vulnerable subpopulation.通过接种疫苗来保护弱势群体。
PLoS Med. 2007 May;4(5):e174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040174.
2
Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation strategies for the Canadian population.加拿大人口最佳大流行性流感疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2010 May 6;5(5):e10520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010520.
3
Optimizing vaccine allocation at different points in time during an epidemic.优化疫情期间不同时间点的疫苗分配。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 11;5(11):e13767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013767.
4
Optimal allocation of pandemic influenza vaccine depends on age, risk and timing.大流行性流感疫苗的最佳分配取决于年龄、风险和时机。
Vaccine. 2008 Jul 4;26(29-30):3742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.043. Epub 2008 May 7.
5
Positive network assortativity of influenza vaccination at a high school: implications for outbreak risk and herd immunity.高中流感疫苗接种的正网络同配性:对爆发风险和群体免疫的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087042. eCollection 2014.
6
Cost-utility analysis of increasing uptake of universal seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) in children aged 6 months and older in Germany.德国增加 6 个月及以上儿童普遍接种季节性四价流感疫苗(QIV)的成本效用分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2058304. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2058304. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2023-2024)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2023—2024年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 10;44(10):1507-1530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230908-00139.
8
Optimal strategies of social distancing and vaccination against seasonal influenza.季节性流感的社交隔离和疫苗接种的最优策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(5-6):1615-34. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1615.
9
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 10;43(10):1515-1544. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220825-00734.
10
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 6;56(10):1356-1386. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220825-00840.

引用本文的文献

1
Where to locate COVID-19 mass vaccination facilities?新冠病毒大规模疫苗接种设施应设在哪里?
Nav Res Logist. 2022 Mar;69(2):179-200. doi: 10.1002/nav.22007. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Understanding the impact of disease and vaccine mechanisms on the importance of optimal vaccine allocation.了解疾病和疫苗机制对优化疫苗分配重要性的影响。
Infect Dis Model. 2023 May 22;8(2):539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.05.003. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Asymptotic Analysis of Optimal Vaccination Policies.最优疫苗接种策略的渐近分析。

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative analysis of influenza vaccination programs.流感疫苗接种计划的比较分析。
PLoS Med. 2006 Oct;3(10):e387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030387.
2
Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease.新入侵传染病流行最终规模公式的通用性。
Bull Math Biol. 2006 Apr;68(3):679-702. doi: 10.1007/s11538-005-9047-7. Epub 2006 Apr 8.
3
Public health. Who should get influenza vaccine when not all can?公共卫生。当并非所有人都能接种流感疫苗时,谁应该接种?
Bull Math Biol. 2023 Jan 20;85(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11538-022-01114-3.
4
Targeted vaccination and the speed of SARS-CoV-2 adaptation.靶向疫苗接种与 SARS-CoV-2 适应速度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 18;119(3). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110666119.
5
"Hot-spotting" to improve vaccine allocation by harnessing digital contact tracing technology: An application of percolation theory.利用数字接触者追踪技术进行热点定位以改善疫苗分配:渗流理论的应用。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0256889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256889. eCollection 2021.
6
Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time attack-rate estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.利用罗德岛和马萨诸塞州实时发病率估计值优化 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗分配。
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w.
7
Transmission dynamics are crucial to COVID-19 vaccination policy.传播动态对新冠疫苗接种政策至关重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105878118.
8
Age-dependence of healthcare interventions for COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省 COVID-19 医疗干预措施的年龄相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10611-4.
9
Prioritising COVID-19 vaccination in changing social and epidemiological landscapes: a mathematical modelling study.在不断变化的社会和流行病学背景下优先考虑 COVID-19 疫苗接种:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1097-1106. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00057-8. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time seroprevalence estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.利用罗德岛州和马萨诸塞州的实时血清流行率估计值进行最佳的新冠病毒疫苗分配
medRxiv. 2021 Jan 15:2021.01.12.21249694. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249694.
Science. 2006 May 12;312(5775):854-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1125347.
4
Public health. Community studies for vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza.公共卫生。针对学童接种流感疫苗的社区研究。
Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):615-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1122143.
5
Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors.老年人流感疫苗有效性评估中的偏差证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):337-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi274. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
6
Functional status is a confounder of the association of influenza vaccine and risk of all cause mortality in seniors.功能状态是流感疫苗与老年人全因死亡率风险之间关联的一个混杂因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):345-52. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi275. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
7
Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: a quantitative review.老年人对流感疫苗接种的抗体反应:一项定量综述。
Vaccine. 2006 Feb 20;24(8):1159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.105. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
8
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly people: a systematic review.流感疫苗在老年人中的有效性和效果:一项系统评价
Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1165-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67339-4. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
9
Live attenuated influenza vaccine, trivalent, is safe in healthy children 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age in a community-based, nonrandomized, open-label trial.在一项基于社区的非随机开放标签试验中,三价减毒活流感疫苗对于18个月至4岁、5至9岁以及10至18岁的健康儿童是安全的。
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):e397-407. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2258.
10
Identifying pediatric age groups for influenza vaccination using a real-time regional surveillance system.使用实时区域监测系统确定流感疫苗接种的儿童年龄组。
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct 1;162(7):686-93. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi257. Epub 2005 Aug 17.