Minhage Margareta, Larsson Bodil Wilde, Gustafsson Gunnel, Hamrin Elisabeth
Department of Medicine and Care, Division of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Int J Nurs Pract. 2007 Jun;13(3):139-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00619.x.
We examined whether the Swedish adaptation of the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Multilevel Assessment Instrument (PGCMAI) developed by Lawton meets criteria for reliability and validity in an elderly Swedish population with locomotor disability. Data were collected, using the mid-length version of the instrument, from 199 elderly people with locomotor disability in two Swedish counties. Reliability was determined by Cronbach's alpha and construct validity was tested by means of exploratory factor analysis. Comparison was made with the Standardized Practical Equipment (SPE) test. Factor analysis identified eight factors, which were comparable to the original eight domains. There was a logical correlation between the PGCMAI and the SPE test. Further psychometric testing is recommended on other groups of elderly people.
我们研究了由劳顿开发的《费城老年中心多级评估工具》(PGCMAI)的瑞典语改编版,在患有运动障碍的瑞典老年人群体中是否符合信度和效度标准。使用该工具的中等长度版本,从瑞典两个县的199名患有运动障碍的老年人中收集了数据。通过克朗巴哈系数确定信度,并通过探索性因素分析测试结构效度。与标准化实用设备(SPE)测试进行了比较。因素分析确定了八个因素,与最初的八个领域相当。PGCMAI与SPE测试之间存在逻辑相关性。建议对其他老年人群体进行进一步的心理测量测试。