Otto Susanne, Kroesen Anton J, Hotz Hubert G, Buhr Heinz J, Kruschewski Martin
Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jan;53(1):14-20. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9815-3. Epub 2007 May 23.
Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the recommended method for treatment of cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum. Thus very low anastomoses are necessary to preserve continence, and pouch reconstruction is favored. It is unclear whether the level of anastomosis is important for continence and quality of life in colonic J-pouch reconstruction. In this investigation all patients were included who underwent curative elective anterior continuity resection with colorectal or coloanal J-pouch reconstruction for primary rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and any signs of recurrence at the time of investigation. Evaluation of continence performance by Wexner and Holschneider questionnaire and quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 (EORTC) questionnaires was done 220 +/- 38 days after closure of the protective Ileostomy, which was performed 106 +/- 48 days after primary intervention. Fifty-two patients (79%) were analyzed. Colopouch rectal anastomosis was performed in eighteen cases and colopouch anal anastomosis in thirty-four cases. Fifty percent of the patients in both groups were continent for solid stool. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of incontinence for liquid stool, however. They took stool-regulating medicine more frequently and complained of fecal soiling and a restricted quality of life. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly lower score on the most important points of the QLQ-C30 (emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, and quality of life). The same applied to the QLQ-CR38 for body image and problems with defecation. The quality of life of patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis was still considered acceptable compared with reference data for the normal healthy population, however. Both continence and quality of life are substantially affected by the level of the anastomosis after colonic pouch reconstruction. This suggests preservation of a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible and performing a colopouch rectal anastomosis.
全直肠系膜切除术(TME)已成为治疗直肠中下段癌的推荐方法。因此,为了保持控便能力,极低吻合术是必要的,且结肠袋重建更受青睐。目前尚不清楚在结肠J袋重建中,吻合水平对控便能力和生活质量是否重要。在本研究中,纳入了2001年1月至2004年12月期间因原发性直肠癌接受根治性选择性前位连续性切除并进行结直肠或结肠肛管J袋重建的所有患者。排除标准为远处转移以及研究时的任何复发迹象。在保护性回肠造口关闭后220±38天,使用Wexner和Holschneider问卷评估控便能力,并使用QLQ-C30和QLQ-CR38(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织)问卷评估生活质量,保护性回肠造口在初次干预后106±48天进行。对52例患者(79%)进行了分析。18例行结肠袋直肠吻合术,34例行结肠袋肛管吻合术。两组中50%的患者对固体粪便能保持控便。然而,结肠袋肛管吻合术的患者对液体粪便失禁的发生率显著更高。他们更频繁地服用调节大便的药物,并抱怨有粪便污染和生活质量受限。结肠袋肛管吻合术的患者在QLQ-C30的最重要方面(情绪功能、社会功能、疼痛和生活质量)得分显著更低。对于身体形象和排便问题的QLQ-CR38也是如此。不过,与正常健康人群的参考数据相比,结肠袋肛管吻合术患者的生活质量仍被认为是可以接受的。结肠袋重建后,吻合水平对控便能力和生活质量均有显著影响。这表明在肿瘤学可行的情况下保留一小部分直肠并进行结肠袋直肠吻合术。