Onay Emel Olga, Ungor Mete, Ozdemir Binnaz Handan
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkey.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):e60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo biocompatibility of the new resin-based Epiphany-Resilon root canal filling system after implantation in rat connective tissue.
Thirty-six female Wistar albino rats, 9 months old, weighing 200 to 220 g, were used to evaluate the biocompatibility. Four subcutaneous pockets were created in the back of the rats, and each material (Resilon, gutta-percha, a Teflon tube containing Epiphany, and an empty Teflon tube) was implanted into a specific dorsal site. The empty Teflon tubes were used as control. After 1, 4, and 8 weeks, the implants were removed with the surrounding tissues. The inflammatory tissue reactions were graded after a histopathologic examination.
At each time period, there was practically no difference in the reaction of all the implant materials (P > .05). The intensity of the reaction had diminished by the 4-week observation period, and this reduction continued through the 8-week observation period.
All the tested materials showed an acceptable biocompatibility.
本研究旨在评估新型树脂基Epiphany-Resilon根管充填系统植入大鼠结缔组织后的体内生物相容性。
使用36只9个月大、体重200至220克的雌性Wistar白化大鼠评估生物相容性。在大鼠背部制造四个皮下袋,每种材料(Resilon、牙胶、含Epiphany的聚四氟乙烯管和空聚四氟乙烯管)植入特定的背部部位。空聚四氟乙烯管用作对照。1、4和8周后,将植入物与周围组织一起取出。组织病理学检查后对炎症组织反应进行分级。
在每个时间段,所有植入材料的反应实际上没有差异(P>.05)。反应强度在4周观察期时有所降低,并且这种降低在8周观察期内持续存在。
所有测试材料均显示出可接受的生物相容性。