• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

效应量度:相对风险、比值比、风险差值及“需治疗人数”。

Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and 'number needed to treat'.

作者信息

Tripepi G, Jager K J, Dekker F W, Wanner C, Zoccali C

机构信息

1CNR-IBIM, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2007 Oct;72(7):789-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002432. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1038/sj.ki.5002432
PMID:17653136
Abstract

Epidemiological studies aim at assessing the relationship between exposures and outcomes. Clinicians are interested in knowing not only whether a link between a given exposure (e.g. smoking) and a certain outcome (e.g. myocardial infarction) is statistically significant, but also the magnitude of this relationship. The 'measures of effect' are indexes that summarize the strength of the link between exposures and outcomes and can help the clinician in taking decisions in every day clinical practice. In epidemiological studies, the effect of exposure can be measured both in relative and absolute terms. The risk ratio, the incidence rate ratio, and the odds ratio are relative measures of effect. Risk difference is an absolute measure of effect and it is calculated by subtracting the risk of the outcome in exposed individuals from that of unexposed.

摘要

流行病学研究旨在评估暴露因素与结局之间的关系。临床医生不仅想知道给定暴露因素(如吸烟)与特定结局(如心肌梗死)之间的联系在统计学上是否显著,还想了解这种关系的强度。“效应测量指标”是总结暴露因素与结局之间联系强度的指标,有助于临床医生在日常临床实践中做出决策。在流行病学研究中,暴露因素的效应可以用相对和绝对两种方式来衡量。风险比、发病率比和比值比是效应的相对测量指标。风险差是效应的绝对测量指标,通过用未暴露个体结局的风险减去暴露个体结局的风险来计算。

相似文献

1
Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and 'number needed to treat'.效应量度:相对风险、比值比、风险差值及“需治疗人数”。
Kidney Int. 2007 Oct;72(7):789-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002432. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
2
Measures of effect in epidemiological research.流行病学研究中的效应测量。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(2):c91-3. doi: 10.1159/000312870. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
3
Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.在逻辑回归分析中估计调整后的需治疗人数(NNT)指标。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5586-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3061.
4
Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat--which of these should we use?比值比、相对危险度、绝对危险度降低率和需治疗人数——我们应该使用其中哪一个?
Value Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(5):431-6. doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55150.x.
5
An overview of standard statistical methods for assessing exposure-outcome link in survival analysis (Part I): basic concepts.生存分析中评估暴露-结局关联的标准统计方法概述(第一部分):基本概念。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Apr;24(2):109-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03325157.
6
Evidence-based dermatology: number needed to treat and its relation to other risk measures.循证皮肤病学:治疗所需人数及其与其他风险指标的关系。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Population-based study of non-infectious rhinitis in relation to occupational exposure, age, sex, and smoking.基于人群的非感染性鼻炎与职业暴露、年龄、性别及吸烟关系的研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Jul;42(1):23-8. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10083.
8
[Effect measures and confidence intervals].[效应量与置信区间]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Aug 20;111(19):2440-2.
9
Estimating a treatment effect: Choosing between relative and absolute measures.估计治疗效果:在相对指标和绝对指标之间进行选择。
Mult Scler. 2017 Feb;23(2):197-200. doi: 10.1177/1352458516645671. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
10
Understanding relative risk, odds ratio, and related terms: as simple as it can get.理解相对风险、优势比和相关术语:尽可能简单。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;76(7):e857-61. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15f10150.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Risk Factors of Medication Incidents Across Stages of Medication Management in Residential Aged Care: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of 5700 Reported Incidents.老年护理机构药物管理各阶段用药事件的特征与风险因素:一项对5700起报告事件的纵向队列研究
Drug Saf. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01602-0.
2
Impact of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medicines on falls among older adults in 23 residential aged care facilities in Australia: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.澳大利亚23家老年护理机构中潜在不适当精神药物对老年人跌倒的影响:一项回顾性纵向队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):e096187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096187.
3
Inequalities in paediatric hospitalisations for costly and prevalent conditions in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.
加拿大安大略省因昂贵且常见疾病导致的儿科住院治疗不平等现象:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Mar 19;45:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101056. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Methods in causal inference. Part 4: confounding in experiments.因果推断方法。第4部分:实验中的混杂因素。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Sep 27;6:e43. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.34. eCollection 2024.
5
The benefit of reduced serum phosphate levels depends on patient characteristics: a nationwide prospective cohort study.血清磷酸盐水平降低的益处取决于患者特征:一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Oct 4;17(10):sfae263. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae263. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Time-dependent cardiovascular risks following pneumonia in inpatient and outpatient settings: A register-based cohort study.住院和门诊肺炎患者随时间变化的心血管风险:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Aug 6;22:200317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200317. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Methodological biases in observational hospital studies of COVID-19 treatment effectiveness: pitfalls and potential.COVID-19治疗效果的观察性医院研究中的方法学偏倚:陷阱与潜力
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 21;11:1362192. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1362192. eCollection 2024.
8
The effectiveness of community health worker training, equipping, and deployment in reducing COVID-19 infections and deaths in rural Western Kenya: A comparison of two counties.肯尼亚西部农村地区社区卫生工作者培训、装备配备及部署在减少新冠病毒感染和死亡方面的成效:两个县的比较
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 25;4(3):e0003036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003036. eCollection 2024.
9
Reply to Amacher et al.对阿马彻等人的回复
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad116.
10
Long-term exposure and health risk assessment from air pollution: impact of regional scale mobility.长期暴露于空气污染与健康风险评估:区域尺度流动性的影响。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 May 19;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00333-8.