• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型生物过滤器在孵化场卫生中的功效:I. 去除空气中的细菌、灰尘和内毒素。

Efficacy of a novel biofilter in hatchery sanitation: I. Removal of airborne bacteria, dust and endotoxin.

作者信息

Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska Anna, Tymczyna Leszek, Skórska Czesława, Sitkowska Jolanta, Cholewa Grazyna, Dutkiewicz Jacek

机构信息

Department of Animal Hygiene and Environment, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, University of Agriculture in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007;14(1):141-50.

PMID:17655192
Abstract

A novel biofilter containing organic, bentonite and halloysite media was applied for elimination of microbial pollutants from the air of an industrial hatchery. The concentrations of total mesophilic bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, thermophilic actinomycetes, dust and bacterial endotoxin were determined in the air of hatchery during 2 months before installation of the biofilter, and during 6 months after installation of the biofilter, at the inlet and outlet ducts from each medium. Before installation of the biofilter, the concentrations of total mesophilic bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, thermophilic actinomycetes, dust and endotoxin in the air were within the ranges of 0.97-131.2x10(3) cfu/m3, 0.0-34.4x10(3) cfu/m3, 0.0-0.02x10(3) cfu/m3, 0.37-4.53 mg/m3, and 50.9-520,450.4 ng/m3, respectively. Enterococcus faecalis and Gram-negative bacteria (Acinetobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, and other species) prevailed among bacterial species recovered from the air of the hatchery. A total of 56 species or genera of bacteria were identified in the air samples taken in the examined hatchery; of these, 11, 11 and 6 species or genera respectively were reported as having allergenic, immunotoxic and/or infectious properties The concentrations of total mesophilic bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and endotoxin found at the inlet duct of the biofilter after its installation were significantly smaller compared to those recorded before its installation (p<0.05). The concentrations of Gram-negative bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and dust found at the outlet ducts of biofilter after its installation were significantly smaller compared to those recorded at the inlet duct of the biofilter (p<0.01). The concentrations of total meso-philic bacteria were also smaller at the outlet ducts of the biofilter compared to that at the inlet duct; however, the difference was not significant because of the massive growth of Streptomyces species in the biofilter's media which contaminated the outcoming air. In conclusion, the applied biofilter proved to be effective in the elimination of potentially pathogenic bacteria, dust and endotoxin from the air of the hatchery. The efficacy of the biofilter could be improved by the inhibition of the Streptomyces growth in the media of the biofilter.

摘要

一种含有有机、膨润土和埃洛石介质的新型生物滤器被用于去除工业孵化场空气中的微生物污染物。在安装生物滤器前2个月以及安装生物滤器后6个月期间,分别在每个介质的进、出口管道处测定孵化场空气中总嗜温菌、革兰氏阴性菌、嗜热放线菌、灰尘和细菌内毒素的浓度。在安装生物滤器之前,空气中总嗜温菌、革兰氏阴性菌、嗜热放线菌、灰尘和内毒素的浓度分别在0.97 - 131.2×10³ cfu/m³、0.0 - 34.4×10³ cfu/m³、0.0 - 0.02×10³ cfu/m³、0.37 - 4.53 mg/m³和50.9 - 520450.4 ng/m³范围内。从孵化场空气中分离出的细菌种类中,粪肠球菌和革兰氏阴性菌(不动杆菌属、大肠杆菌、阴沟肠杆菌等)占优势。在所检测的孵化场采集的空气样本中共鉴定出56种或属的细菌;其中,分别有11种、11种和6种或属被报告具有致敏、免疫毒性和/或感染性。安装生物滤器后,在其进气管处测得的总嗜温菌、革兰氏阴性菌、粪肠球菌和内毒素浓度与安装前记录的浓度相比显著降低(p<0.05)。安装生物滤器后,在其出气管处测得的革兰氏阴性菌、粪肠球菌和灰尘浓度与在生物滤器进气管处记录的浓度相比显著降低(p<0.01)。与进气管处相比,生物滤器出气管处的总嗜温菌浓度也较低;然而,由于生物滤器介质中链霉菌大量生长污染了排出的空气,差异不显著。总之,所应用的生物滤器被证明对去除孵化场空气中潜在的病原菌、灰尘和内毒素是有效的。通过抑制生物滤器介质中链霉菌的生长,可以提高生物滤器的效能。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a novel biofilter in hatchery sanitation: I. Removal of airborne bacteria, dust and endotoxin.一种新型生物过滤器在孵化场卫生中的功效:I. 去除空气中的细菌、灰尘和内毒素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007;14(1):141-50.
2
Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants.草药加工厂中空气传播微生物和内毒素的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001;8(2):201-11.
3
Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during flax scutching on farms.农场亚麻打麻过程中暴露于空气传播的微生物、灰尘和内毒素中。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11(2):309-17.
4
Exposure to bioaerosols in a municipal sewage treatment plant.城市污水处理厂中生物气溶胶的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(2):241-8.
5
Exposure to airborne Gram-negative bacteria, dust and endotoxin in paper factories.造纸厂中暴露于空气传播的革兰氏阴性菌、粉尘和内毒素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(1):93-100.
6
Exposure to airborne microorganisms in Polish sawmills.波兰锯木厂空气中微生物的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001;8(1):71-80.
7
Exposure of hop growers to bioaerosols.啤酒花种植者接触生物气溶胶的情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11(1):129-38.
8
Exposure to airborne microorganisms in fiberboard and chipboard factories.纤维板和刨花板工厂中空气传播微生物的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001;8(2):191-9.
9
Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during processing of peppermint and chamomile herbs on farms.在农场加工薄荷和洋甘菊草药过程中暴露于空气传播的微生物、灰尘和内毒素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):281-8.
10
Exposure of Indian agricultural workers to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during handling of various plant products.印度农业工人在处理各种植物产品过程中暴露于空气中的微生物、灰尘和内毒素的情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):269-75.

引用本文的文献

1
A short review of bioaerosol emissions from gas bioreactors: Health threats, influencing factors and control technologies.生物气溶胶气体生物反应器排放的简短回顾:健康威胁、影响因素和控制技术。
Chemosphere. 2020 Aug;253:126737. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126737. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Investigation of Removal Capacities of Biofilters for Airborne Viable Micro-Organisms.生物过滤器对空气传播活菌去除能力的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 19;15(3):551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030551.
3
Nanosilver Biocidal Properties and Their Application in Disinfection of Hatchers in Poultry Processing Plants.
纳米银的杀菌特性及其在家禽加工厂孵化箱消毒中的应用。
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2016;2016:5214783. doi: 10.1155/2016/5214783. Epub 2016 Jan 24.