Suppr超能文献

《健康保险流通与责任法案》授权对参与临床研究意愿的影响。

The impact of HIPAA authorization on willingness to participate in clinical research.

作者信息

Dunlop Anne L, Graham Tracie, Leroy Zanie, Glanz Karen, Dunlop Boadie

机构信息

Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;17(11):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study systematically examined the impact of inclusion of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization on the willingness of African Americans of diverse sociodemographic characteristics to participate in a clinical research study and explored reasons for nonparticipation.

METHODS

For a purposive sample of 384 African American outpatients at four metropolitan primary care clinics from August 2005 through May 2006, willingness to participate in a hypothetic clinical research study of an antihypertensive medication under one of two experimental conditions was compared. Interviewees were randomly assigned to undergo informed consent alone (control group) or informed consent with HIPAA authorization (HIPAA group). They were asked whether they would participate and reasons for their decisions.

RESULTS

A smaller proportion of interviewees in the HIPAA group were willing to enroll in the study (27% vs. 39%; p = 0.02), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.36-0.91). Those in the HIPAA group were more likely to give reasons related to privacy (p < 0.001), poor understanding of the form (p = 0.01), and mistrust or fear of research (p = 0.04) for nonparticipation.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of HIPAA authorization within the informed consent process may adversely affect the willingness of African Americans to participate in clinical research and may raise concerns about privacy, understanding the forms, and mistrust or fear of research.

摘要

目的

本研究系统地考察了纳入《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)授权对具有不同社会人口学特征的非裔美国人参与临床研究意愿的影响,并探讨了不参与的原因。

方法

从2005年8月至2006年5月,选取了来自四个大城市初级保健诊所的384名非裔美国门诊患者作为有目的样本,比较了他们在两种实验条件之一参与一种抗高血压药物假设性临床研究的意愿。受访者被随机分配仅接受知情同意(对照组)或接受带有HIPAA授权的知情同意(HIPAA组)。询问他们是否愿意参与以及做出决定的原因。

结果

HIPAA组中愿意参加研究的受访者比例较小(27%对39%;p = 0.02),调整后的优势比为0.56(95%置信区间 = 0.36 - 0.91)。HIPAA组的受访者更有可能给出与隐私相关(p < 0.001)、对表格理解不佳(p = 0.01)以及对研究不信任或恐惧(p = 0.04)的不参与原因。

结论

在知情同意过程中纳入HIPAA授权可能会对非裔美国人参与临床研究的意愿产生不利影响,并可能引发对隐私、表格理解以及对研究的不信任或恐惧的担忧。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Privacy and confidentiality in pragmatic clinical trials.实用临床试验中的隐私与保密
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):520-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597677. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Research participation by older adults at end of life: barriers and solutions.老年人临终时的研究参与:障碍与解决方案。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;2(3):162-71. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090421-05. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

3
Barriers of HIPAA regulation to implementation of health services research.
J Med Syst. 2006 Feb;30(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-7406-z.
6
Family caregiver research and the HIPAA factor.
Gerontologist. 2005 Aug;45(4):432-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.4.432.
8
HIPAA--Implications for research.《健康保险流通与责任法案》——对研究的影响。
Orthop Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):139-42. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200503000-00011.
9
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the informed consent process.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 7;141(11):897-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00034.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验