Smith J W, Lee J A, Fletcher W B, Morris C A, Parker D A, Yetts R, Magrathe D I, Perkins F T
J Hyg (Lond). 1976 Apr;76(2):235-47. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055133.
Serum neutralizing antibodies to polioviruses were titrated in serum samples from 182 police cadets aged 16-18 years before and, in 168 of the cadets, 6 weeks after vaccination with a single dose of oral polio vaccine (OPV). Faecal excretion of poliovirus was also followed. Vaccination histories were obtained and confirmed whenever possible. Pre-vaccination antibody could not be detected against type 1 in 9-3% cadets, against type 2 in 2-7% and against type 3 in 7-7%. Absence of antibody to at least one virus type was found in 14-3% of the cadets. In 93 cadets in whom vaccination histories could be confirmed 40 had received only inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) previously; of these 23% lacked antibody to at least one virus type, and they had less intestinal immunity to a challenge dose of OPV than those previously given OPV. Only two of the cadets known to have had OPV were non-immune - both had received a single dose following full courses of IPV. However, cadets who had received OPV had their last dose of vaccine more recently (average 4-6 years) than those who had received only IPV (all 12 years or more). The serum antibody response to a single booster dose of OPV, and the faecal excretion of each type of virus after vaccination, showed an inverse relation to the corresponding pre-vaccination antibody concentration. A single dose of OPV did not reliably boost the immunity of those who possessed adequate immunity, and a failure to respond was also observed in a proportion of the cadets with no detectable antibody, mostly in the case of type 3 antibody and particularly if antibody to types 1 or 2 virus was also absent. No evidence was obtained that intestinal immunity could be expected in the absence of detectable circulating antibody. The reasons for the absence of a serological response to OPV in some subjects are discussed and consideration is given to the practical significance of the findings. It is suggested that reinforcement of polio immunity at school-leaving is important, particularly at the present time when many of those aged 16-18 years will have been vaccinated only with IPV. A single dose of OPV is not ideal for this purpose, not only because a small proportion of persons are liable to be left unprotected, but also because failure to produce a reliable boost in persons with adequate immunity at the time of vaccination gives rise to the possibility that they may become susceptible later in adult life.
在182名年龄在16 - 18岁的警察学员的血清样本中,对脊髓灰质炎病毒的血清中和抗体进行了滴定,其中168名学员在接种单剂量口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)6周后再次进行了检测。同时还追踪了脊髓灰质炎病毒的粪便排泄情况。尽可能获取并确认了疫苗接种史。在接种疫苗前,9.3%的学员未检测到针对1型病毒的抗体,2.7%的学员未检测到针对2型病毒的抗体,7.7%的学员未检测到针对3型病毒的抗体。14.3%的学员至少对一种病毒类型缺乏抗体。在93名能够确认疫苗接种史的学员中,40人之前仅接种过灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV);其中23%的人至少对一种病毒类型缺乏抗体,并且他们对OPV激发剂量的肠道免疫力低于那些之前接种过OPV的学员。已知接种过OPV的学员中只有两人无免疫力——两人在完成IPV全程接种后仅接种了单剂量OPV。然而,接种过OPV的学员上次接种疫苗的时间比仅接种过IPV的学员更近(平均4 - 6年),而仅接种过IPV的学员上次接种时间均在12年或更久之前。对单剂量OPV加强剂的血清抗体反应以及接种疫苗后每种病毒类型的粪便排泄情况,与相应的接种前抗体浓度呈反比关系。单剂量OPV不能可靠地增强那些具有足够免疫力者的免疫力,并且在一部分未检测到抗体的学员中也观察到了无反应情况,大多是针对3型抗体,特别是在同时也缺乏1型或2型病毒抗体的情况下。没有证据表明在未检测到循环抗体的情况下可以预期有肠道免疫力。讨论了一些受试者对OPV无血清学反应的原因,并考虑了这些发现的实际意义。建议在离校时加强脊髓灰质炎免疫力很重要,特别是在目前许多16 - 18岁的人仅接种过IPV的情况下。单剂量OPV并非为此目的的理想选择,不仅因为一小部分人可能得不到保护,而且因为在接种时未能对具有足够免疫力的人产生可靠的增强作用,有可能导致他们在成年后期变得易感。