Suppr超能文献

市中心一家医疗机构计划在家分娩的结果。

Outcome of planned home births in an inner city practice.

作者信息

Ford C, Iliffe S, Franklin O

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, Whittington Hospital, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1517-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6816.1517.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of pregnancy for women booking for home births in an inner London practice between 1977 and 1989.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of practice obstetric records.

SETTING

A general practice in London.

SUBJECTS

285 women registered with the practice or referred by neighbouring general practitioners or local community midwives.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Place of birth and number of cases transferred to specialist care before, during, and after labour.

RESULTS

Of 285 women who booked for home births, eight left the practice area before the onset of labour, giving a study population of 277 women. Six had spontaneous abortions, 26 were transferred to specialist care during pregnancy, another 26 were transferred during labour, and four were transferred in the postpartum period. 215 women (77.6%, 95% confidence interval 72.7 to 82.5) had normal births at home without needing specialist help. Transfer to specialist care during pregnancy was not significantly related to parity, but nulliparous women were significantly more likely to require transfer during labour (p = 0.00002). Postnatal complications requiring specialist attention were uncommon among mothers delivered at home (four cases) and rare among their babies (three cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Birth at home is practical and safe for a self selected population of multiparous women, but nulliparous women are more likely to require transfer to hospital during labour because of delay in labour. Close cooperation between the general practitioner and both community midwives and hospital obstetricians is important in minimising the risks of trial of labour at home.

摘要

目的

评估1977年至1989年间在伦敦市中心一家诊所预约在家分娩的女性的妊娠结局。

设计

对诊所产科记录进行回顾性研究。

地点

伦敦的一家全科诊所。

研究对象

在该诊所注册或由邻近全科医生或当地社区助产士转诊的285名女性。

主要观察指标

分娩地点以及分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后转诊至专科护理的病例数。

结果

在285名预约在家分娩的女性中,8人在分娩开始前离开了诊所所在地区,因此研究人群为277名女性。6人自然流产,26人在孕期转诊至专科护理,另有26人在分娩期间转诊,4人在产后转诊。215名女性(77.6%,95%置信区间72.7%至82.5%)在家中正常分娩,无需专科帮助。孕期转诊至专科护理与产次无显著相关性,但初产妇在分娩期间需要转诊的可能性显著更高(p = 0.00002)。在家分娩的母亲中,需要专科关注的产后并发症并不常见(4例),在其婴儿中也很少见(3例)。

结论

对于自行选择的经产妇群体来说,在家分娩是可行且安全的,但初产妇由于产程延迟,在分娩期间更有可能需要转诊至医院。全科医生与社区助产士和医院产科医生之间的密切合作对于将在家分娩试验的风险降至最低非常重要。

相似文献

8
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications.计划在家分娩:对额外禁忌证的需求。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):401.e1-401.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

3
Outcome in low risk pregnancies.低风险妊娠的结局
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Sep;75(2):F97-102. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.2.f97.
6
Choice and chance in low risk maternity care.低风险孕产妇护理中的选择与机遇
BMJ. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1487-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6816.1487.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of maternity patients suitable for home delivery.适合在家分娩的产妇情况回顾。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jun 12;284(6331):1753-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6331.1753.
5
Clinical experimentation in obstetrics.产科临床实验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Nov 21;295(6609):1298-300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6609.1298.
6
7
Audit of 26 years of obstetrics in general practice.全科医疗中26年产科情况的审计。
BMJ. 1989 Apr 22;298(6680):1077-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1077.
8
General practitioner obstetrics.全科医生产科
BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):690-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.690.
9
Obstacles to acceptance of clinical decision analysis.临床决策分析被接受的障碍。
BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):579-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.579.
10
General practitioner obstetrics in Bradford.布拉德福德的全科医生产科服务
BMJ. 1990 Mar 17;300(6726):725-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.725.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验