• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎运动控制测试的可靠性

Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.

作者信息

Luomajoki Hannu, Kool Jan, de Bruin Eling D, Airaksinen Olavi

机构信息

Physiotherapie Reinach, 5734 Reinach, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Sep 12;8:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-90.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-8-90
PMID:17850669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2164955/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Movement control dysfunction [MCD] reduces active control of movements. Patients with MCD might form an important subgroup among patients with non specific low back pain. The diagnosis is based on the observation of active movements. Although widely used clinically, only a few studies have been performed to determine the test reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of movement control dysfunction tests of the lumbar spine.

METHODS

We videoed patients performing a standardized test battery consisting of 10 active movement tests for motor control in 27 patients with non specific low back pain and 13 patients with other diagnoses but without back pain. Four physiotherapists independently rated test performances as correct or incorrect per observation, blinded to all other patient information and to each other. The study was conducted in a private physiotherapy outpatient practice in Reinach, Switzerland. Kappa coefficients, percentage agreements and confidence intervals for inter- and intra-rater results were calculated.

RESULTS

The kappa values for inter-tester reliability ranged between 0.24 - 0.71. Six tests out of ten showed a substantial reliability [k > 0.6]. Intra-tester reliability was between 0.51 - 0.96, all tests but one showed substantial reliability [k > 0.6].

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapists were able to reliably rate most of the tests in this series of motor control tasks as being performed correctly or not, by viewing films of patients with and without back pain performing the task.

摘要

背景

运动控制功能障碍[MCD]会降低对运动的主动控制。MCD患者可能是非特异性腰痛患者中的一个重要亚组。诊断基于对主动运动的观察。尽管在临床上广泛使用,但仅有少数研究用于确定该测试的可靠性。本研究的目的是确定腰椎运动控制功能障碍测试的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。

方法

我们对27例非特异性腰痛患者和13例有其他诊断但无背痛的患者进行标准化测试组的录像,该测试组包括10项运动控制主动运动测试。四名物理治疗师在对所有其他患者信息及彼此不知情的情况下,独立地将每次观察的测试表现评定为正确或不正确。该研究在瑞士赖纳赫的一家私人物理治疗门诊进行。计算了评分者间和评分者内结果的kappa系数、百分比一致性和置信区间。

结果

测试者间可靠性的kappa值在0.24 - 0.71之间。十项测试中有六项显示出较高的可靠性[k > 0.6]。测试者内可靠性在0.51 - 0.96之间,除一项测试外所有测试均显示出较高的可靠性[k > 0.6]。

结论

通过观看有或无背痛患者执行任务的影片,物理治疗师能够可靠地将本系列运动控制任务中的大多数测试评定为执行正确与否。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/b91e78dab70b/1471-2474-8-90-10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/d2e564ded091/1471-2474-8-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/26d3e9dff162/1471-2474-8-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/e741a77feb1e/1471-2474-8-90-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/8e8c42018604/1471-2474-8-90-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/2f2ef0c0057b/1471-2474-8-90-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/7d26d3a25a01/1471-2474-8-90-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/f61507cc46fc/1471-2474-8-90-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/1932067285f5/1471-2474-8-90-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/ffbac76f9898/1471-2474-8-90-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/b91e78dab70b/1471-2474-8-90-10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/d2e564ded091/1471-2474-8-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/26d3e9dff162/1471-2474-8-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/e741a77feb1e/1471-2474-8-90-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/8e8c42018604/1471-2474-8-90-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/2f2ef0c0057b/1471-2474-8-90-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/7d26d3a25a01/1471-2474-8-90-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/f61507cc46fc/1471-2474-8-90-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/1932067285f5/1471-2474-8-90-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/ffbac76f9898/1471-2474-8-90-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df60/2164955/b91e78dab70b/1471-2474-8-90-10.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.腰椎运动控制测试的可靠性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Sep 12;8:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-90.
2
Reliability of movement control tests on the cervical spine.颈椎运动控制测试的可靠性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 29;15:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-402.
3
A reliability study of the new sensors for movement analysis (SHARIF-HMIS).用于运动分析的新型传感器(SHARIF-HMIS)的可靠性研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Apr;20(2):341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
4
The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of passive physiological accessory movement assessment of lumbar spine in novice manual therapists.新手手法治疗师对腰椎被动生理附属运动评估的评分者间和评分者内信度。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Jul;16(3):289-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines. Marines 临床运动控制测试的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 29;13:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-263.
6
Movement control tests for the lumbopelvic complex. Are these tests reliable and valid?腰骶部复合体的运动控制测试。这些测试可靠且有效吗?
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 May;33(5):386-397. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1318422.
7
Inter-and intra-tester reliability of a battery of cervical movement control dysfunction tests.一组颈椎运动控制功能障碍测试的测试者间和测试者内可靠性
Man Ther. 2015 Aug;20(4):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
Inter-rater reliability of three standardized functional tests in patients with low back pain.下腰痛患者三种标准化功能测试的评分者间信度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jun 2;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-58.
9
Visual and instrumental diagnostics using chromokinegraphics: Reliability and validity for low back pain stratification.使用色动描记法的视觉与仪器诊断:对下背痛分层的可靠性和有效性
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(2):345-353. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181203.
10
Reliability of lumbar movement dysfunction tests for chronic low back pain patients.慢性下腰痛患者腰椎运动功能障碍测试的可靠性
Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time and immediate effects of backward walking exercise on pain intensity and lumbopelvic movement control in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain with lumbar flexion syndrome.倒走运动对伴有腰椎前屈综合征的慢性非特异性下腰痛患者疼痛强度及腰骶部运动控制的实时和即时影响
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330609. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing motor control and movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a scoping review and development of an ICF-based conceptual framework.评估非特异性下腰痛患者的运动控制和运动质量:一项范围综述及基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的概念框架的构建
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):e091206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091206.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The rater reliability of assessments of symptom provocation in patients with low back pain.腰痛患者症状激发评估的评分者信度。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002 Jan 1;16(2):83-90. doi: 10.3233/bmr-2002-162-306.
2
Are "structural abnormalities" on magnetic resonance imaging a contraindication to the successful conservative treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain?磁共振成像上的“结构异常”是否是慢性非特异性下腰痛保守治疗成功的禁忌症?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19):2250-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232802.95773.89.
3
The use of a mechanism-based classification system to evaluate and direct management of a patient with non-specific chronic low back pain and motor control impairment--a case report.
Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.
用于评估腰椎运动控制障碍的6项运动控制测试组合的效度
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 13;20(6):e0325996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325996. eCollection 2025.
4
The impact of pain from medial meniscus injuries on walking movement patterns.内侧半月板损伤引起的疼痛对步行运动模式的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 22;13:1545521. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1545521. eCollection 2025.
5
Sleep architecture and quality and pain experience in individuals with persistent low back pain and asymptomatic controls.持续性下腰痛患者与无症状对照者的睡眠结构、质量及疼痛体验
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322008. eCollection 2025.
6
Effect of surface inclination and gluteus maximus activation on lumbar lordosis and footpronation in individuals with low back pain with extension pattern: a preliminary study.表面倾斜度和臀大肌激活对具有伸展模式的下背痛个体腰椎前凸和足内翻的影响:一项初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96048-w.
7
Effect of an 11-Week Repeated Maximal Lumbar Movement with Controlled Breathing on Lumbar Sagittal Range of Motion in Elite Swimmers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.精英游泳运动员进行为期11周的重复最大腰椎运动并控制呼吸对腰椎矢状面活动范围的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;13(5):457. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050457.
8
Restorative Neurostimulation Therapy Compared to Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE) for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain due to Multifidus Dysfunction.与最佳药物治疗相比的恢复性神经刺激疗法:一项用于治疗多裂肌功能障碍所致慢性机械性下腰痛的随机评估(RESTORE)
Pain Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):401-423. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00689-0. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
9
Effects of combining sensory-motor exercises with transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical processing and clinical symptoms in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy: An exploratory randomized controlled trial.感觉运动练习联合经颅直流电刺激对腰骶神经根病患者皮质处理及临床症状的影响:一项探索性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0314361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314361. eCollection 2024.
10
Development of a comprehensive clinical assessment protocol for low back and hip pain in powerlifters: a feasibility study.制定针对力量举运动员腰臀部疼痛的综合临床评估方案:一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Dec 12;10(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01579-0.
使用基于机制的分类系统评估和指导非特异性慢性下腰痛及运动控制障碍患者的管理——病例报告
Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
4
Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.非特异性下腰痛体格检查中所用程序的可靠性:一项系统评价
Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):91-102. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70044-7.
5
Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine.针对疑似腰椎运动控制受损情况的髋关节伸展试验的检查者间可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jun;29(5):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.012.
6
Short report: intra-tester reliability of two clinical tests of transversus abdominis muscle recruitment.简短报告:腹横肌募集两项临床测试的测试者内信度
Physiother Res Int. 2006 Mar;11(1):48-50. doi: 10.1002/pri.39.
7
Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain.第4章. 欧洲慢性非特异性下腰痛管理指南
Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
8
An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during "drawing-in" of the abdominal wall.一项关于腹壁“收腹”动作过程中腹横肌功能的磁共振成像研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):E175-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202740.86338.df.
9
Lumbo-pelvic joint protection against antigravity forces: motor control and segmental stiffness assessed with magnetic resonance imaging.腰椎骨盆关节对抗重力的保护作用:通过磁共振成像评估运动控制和节段性刚度。
J Gravit Physiol. 2004 Jul;11(2):P119-22.
10
Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism.慢性下腰痛疾病的诊断与分类:适应性不良运动和运动控制障碍作为潜在机制
Man Ther. 2005 Nov;10(4):242-55. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Sep 9.