• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们与他们:感知模糊群体中的记忆优势。

Us and them: memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups.

作者信息

Rule Nicholas O, Ambady Nalni, Adams Reginald B, Macrae C Neil

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):687-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03196822.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196822
PMID:17972734
Abstract

Ingroup advantages and outgroup deficits in perception and memory are well-established in research on race, gender, and other ostensibly identifiable social categories. The present study extended this research to a social category that is not as perceptually apparent: male sexual orientation. Consistent with hypotheses, an interaction of participant sexual orientation and image sexual orientation revealed an ingroup enhancement and outgroup deficit for memory of faces that participants perceived-both accurately and inaccurately--as belonging to either their ingroup or outgroup in a subsequent task. Additionally, parallel effects were found for the accurate identification of sexual orientation--a finding consistent with previous literature. The present data highlight the importance of social categorization for subsequent memory and suggest that the underlying cognitive machinery responsible for the recognition of groups may be co-opted for other relevant social applications.

摘要

在关于种族、性别及其他表面上可识别的社会类别的研究中,内群体优势以及外群体在感知和记忆方面的不足已得到充分证实。本研究将这一研究扩展至一个在感知上不那么明显的社会类别:男性性取向。与假设一致,参与者性取向与图像性取向的交互作用显示,在后续任务中,参与者准确或不准确地感知为属于其内群体或外群体的面孔记忆存在内群体增强和外群体不足。此外,在性取向的准确识别方面也发现了类似的效应——这一发现与先前的文献一致。目前的数据凸显了社会分类对后续记忆的重要性,并表明负责识别群体的潜在认知机制可能会被用于其他相关的社会应用。

相似文献

1
Us and them: memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups.我们与他们:感知模糊群体中的记忆优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):687-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03196822.
2
Social group membership and an incidental ingroup-memory advantage.社会群体归属与偶然的内群体记忆优势。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):166-178. doi: 10.1177/1747021820948721. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
3
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
4
Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion.单纯的社会分类就能调节对面部表情的情绪识别。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):964-77. doi: 10.1037/a0020400.
5
At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: what race categories communicate about sexual orientation.在明显与隐藏的十字路口:种族类别传达了哪些关于性取向的信息。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e18025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018025.
6
The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.我们当中声名狼藉之人:对不合作的群体成员的声誉记忆增强。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Places and faces: Geographic environment influences the ingroup memory advantage.地点与面孔:地理环境影响内群体记忆优势。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):343-55. doi: 10.1037/a0018589.
8
Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?为什么人们会认为内群体在群体特征上具有同质性,而外群体在群体特征上具有同质性呢?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167206293190.
9
"Not one of us": predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets.“非我们中的一员”:将群体特征否认于模糊目标的预测因素及后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Oct;40(10):1231-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167214539708. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Shared identity is key to effective communication.共同的身份认同是有效沟通的关键。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):171-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167214559709. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Belief in Gender Role Stereotypes Moderates the Use of Gender Typicality Cues when Making Sexual Orientation Judgements from Faces.对性别角色刻板印象的信念会在根据面部特征进行性取向判断时,影响对性别典型性线索的运用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):1233-1244. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03046-6. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
2
A Lower-Class Advantage in Face Memory.底层社会在面孔记忆上的优势。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):285-298. doi: 10.1177/01461672221125599. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Covariation in the recognition of own-race and other-race faces argues against the role of group bias in the other race effect.

本文引用的文献

1
An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition.自身性别偏见以及头发在人脸识别中的重要性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Sep;114(1):101-14. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(03)00052-0.
2
Perceptions of race.对种族的认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):173-179. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00057-3.
3
Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.列队辨认准确性中的年龄差异:人们对与自己年龄相仿者的辨认表现更佳。
自身种族和其他种族面孔识别的共变反对群体偏见在异族效应中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17330-9.
4
Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.群体间的人脸识别偏差受群体地位的调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:837836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836. eCollection 2022.
5
Learning Faces as Concepts Improves Face Recognition by Engaging the Social Brain Network.将面孔作为概念来学习可通过激活社会脑网络来提高人脸识别能力。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 17;17(3):290-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab096.
6
Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition.你在还是不在?群体突显在面孔识别中的内群体偏见中的重要性。
Perception. 2020 Jun;49(6):672-687. doi: 10.1177/0301006620918100. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
An investigation of the effect of race-based social categorization on adults' recognition of emotion.基于种族的社会分类对成年人情绪识别影响的调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192418. eCollection 2018.
8
Social Vision: Functional Forecasting and the Integration of Compound Social Cues.社会视觉:功能预测与复合社会线索的整合
Rev Philos Psychol. 2015 Dec;6(4):591-610. doi: 10.1007/s13164-015-0256-1. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Swiss identity smells like chocolate: Social identity shapes olfactory judgments.瑞士身份闻起来像巧克力:社会认同塑造嗅觉判断。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 11;6:34979. doi: 10.1038/srep34979.
10
Domestic Violence in the Canadian Workplace: Are Coworkers Aware?加拿大职场中的家庭暴力:同事们是否知晓?
Saf Health Work. 2016 Sep;7(3):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Law Hum Behav. 2002 Dec;26(6):641-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1020981501383.
4
Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization.种族能够被消除吗?联合计算与社会分类。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15387-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251541498. Epub 2001 Dec 11.
5
Social cognition: thinking categorically about others.社会认知:对他人进行分类思考。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:93-120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93.
6
Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior.基于行为薄片对性取向判断的准确性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Sep;77(3):538-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.3.538.
7
What gives a face its gender?是什么赋予了面孔性别特征?
Perception. 1993;22(7):829-40. doi: 10.1068/p220829.
8
Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces.判断面部性别和熟悉程度时的特征显著性。
Perception. 1988;17(4):475-81. doi: 10.1068/p170475.
9
Other-race face perception.异族面孔感知。
J Appl Psychol. 1991 Aug;76(4):587-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.587.