Plaschke K, Hill H, Engelhardt R, Thomas C, von Haken R, Scholz M, Kopitz J, Bardenheuer H J, Weisbrod M, Weigand M A
Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62(12):1217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05255.x.
The aim of this study was to examine whether serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) is a reliable indicator of delirium in the ICU, and whether there is a significant correlation between SAA and quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) data in delirious patients. In a prospective cohort study, we assessed ICU patients diagnosed with delirium (n = 37). EEG measurements and blood analysis including SAA were performed 48 h following ICU admission. The presence of delirium was evaluated using the Confusion Assessment Method for critically ill patients in ICU (CAM-ICU). The SAA level was measured using a competitive radioreceptor binding assay for muscarinergic receptors and quantitative EEG was measured using the CATEEM system. We found that, under comparable conditions, patients in the delirium group showed a higher relative EEG theta power and a reduced alpha power (n = 17) than did the non-delirious patients (n = 20). No difference in measured SAA levels were seen; therefore, there was no correlation between SAA and EEG measurements in delirious patients. We conclude that, in contrast to the EEG, the SAA level cannot be proposed as a tool for diagnosing delirium in ICU patients.
本研究的目的是检验血清抗胆碱能活性(SAA)是否为重症监护病房(ICU)中谵妄的可靠指标,以及谵妄患者的SAA与定量脑电图(EEG)数据之间是否存在显著相关性。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,我们评估了诊断为谵妄的ICU患者(n = 37)。在ICU入院48小时后进行EEG测量和包括SAA在内的血液分析。使用ICU中重症患者的意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)评估谵妄的存在。使用针对毒蕈碱受体的竞争性放射受体结合测定法测量SAA水平,并使用CATEEM系统测量定量EEG。我们发现,在可比条件下,谵妄组患者(n = 17)的相对EEG θ功率高于非谵妄患者(n = 20),而α功率降低。未观察到测量的SAA水平存在差异;因此,谵妄患者的SAA与EEG测量之间无相关性。我们得出结论,与EEG不同,SAA水平不能作为诊断ICU患者谵妄的工具。